News that doesn't receive the necessary attention.

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Why does billionaire Chicago Cubs owner Ricketts family hate American voters so much? If Ricketts family can nullify our votes, why should we continue to pay 100% of country's bills? In unprecedented kingmaker moves, Ricketts funds millions in advertising to influence GOP primaries as well as state by state ground efforts to select its own delegates, thus rendering ordinary Americans the laughing stock they were under King George III-Politico, 4/12/16

Our Principles "PAC’s biggest donors, the Ricketts family,...contributed $5 million of the $8 million raised by the PAC through the end of February."...Ricketts family owns Chicago Cubs.
4/12/16, "Billionaires fund anti-Trump delegate push," Politico, Kenneth P. Vogel

"Super PAC mounts state-by-state effort to elect convention delegates who oppose Trump."

"Anti-Trump billionaires are funding ground operations in an increasing number of states
to try to ensure the selection of national convention delegates who oppose Trump. The strategy is being executed by the anti-Trump Our Principles PAC, which has a stated goal of blocking the bombastic billionaire from clinching the GOP presidential nomination before the party’s convention in July.

But the PAC’s officials acknowledge that they likely won’t stop there and that they intend to keep up the pressure all the way through the end of July’s Republican National Convention, possibly including trying to steer the nomination to an alternative candidate.

While engaging in presidential delegate fights is an unprecedented use of super PAC cash, one of Our Principles’ billionaire donors said it’s a smart way to “cover all bases.” And the donor, Minnesota media mogul Stan Hubbard, brushed aside Trump’s increasingly vocal frustration about getting cheated in the battle for delegates.

“There’s nothing unfair about it. He or she who can marshal the most forces and do the best job, will get the nomination,” said Hubbard, who in February donated $10,000 to Our Principles and said he’d consider giving more to the stop-Trump effort. In the coming weeks and even at the convention, Hubbard said, big donors and super PACs like Our Principles “can certainly try to influence people. I could call a delegate and say what I think, if they’d talk to me. I can buy a billboard. I can run ads. Why not?”

Trump’s campaign will also be working to whip delegates, Hubbard noted, “and you’ll have other people trying to do the same thing. So fair is fair.”

Our Principles’ delegate strategy has attracted far less attention — and money — than multimillion-dollar advertising campaigns that have bombarded the televisions, smart phones and mailboxes of regular voters in key primary states like Florida, Wisconsin and New York. 

But in some ways, the effort to influence the much smaller universe of party activists who attend state and national party conventions is more notable. It expands the role of major donors and their super PACs into new terrain that until recently was the sole purview of campaigns and party insiders, and it could set the stage for Our Principles to run a privatized whipping operation — and potentially even play kingmaker at a national convention, where it is increasingly likely that the presidential nomination will be decided in a floor fight where byzantine rules and interpersonal relationships hold sway....

While Our Principles PAC has made clear that it is neutral between Cruz and long-shot GOP presidential hopeful John Kasich, its delegate-outreach efforts have mostly ended up helping Cruz in states that held conventions this month to select their delegates, such as North Dakota and Colorado. And it is planning similar strategies in states that will select their delegates in the coming weeks, such as Wyoming, which holds its convention Saturday, according to its spokesman Tim Miller....

In the run-up to the conventions in North Dakota, Colorado and Wyoming, Our Principles reached out to registered attendees via telephone to try to gauge their loyalties. Then, at the state conventions, the PAC has targeted attendees with mobile advertising and has had three or more local operatives on the ground in each state working the crowd, making sure that anti-Trump attendees are aware of which delegates share their sensibilities, according to Miller....

Those operatives have also supervised the distribution of hundreds of copies of an anti-Trump “voter guide" that portrays the New York billionaire as a charlatan who favored abortion rights, donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democrats, knowingly used “illegal immigrant” labor to build Trump Tower and questioned Ronald Reagan’s backbone, among other sins against conservativism.

That strategy is being mostly implemented by DDC Advocacy, a Washington political consulting shop where one of the partners is Our Principles adviser Sara Taylor Fagen, a former White House political director for George W. Bush.

Our Principles has paid DDC more than $4.1 million for direct mail, phone banking and other voter contact, according to the PAC’s filings with the Federal Election Commission....

The delegate-outreach spending revealed so far pales in comparison to the $11 million that Our Principles has spent on television advertising, making such delegate-targeting worth a try, despite questions about how effective it might be.

Miller stressed that the PAC will continue its heavy advertising to try to influence voters in primaries such as the potentially pivotal contest next week in New York. But he said that Our Principles would also keep up its delegate outreach, and planned to retain at least some of the staffers it paid to work the state conventions.

“We are going to take the fight to Cleveland,” he said Monday. “Our role is going to be secondary to the campaigns, but to the extent that we can continue to communicate with the delegates about Donald Trump and why he’s not a viable general election candidate, we will,” he said, noting that the PAC is well-positioned to work with the delegates during a one-month break between the end of voting and the beginning of the convention.

The PAC test drove the delegate outreach strategy in North Dakota, which earlier this month held a state convention where Cruz dominated, with his preferred candidates taking 18 of 25 slots delegate slots up for grabs.

After that contest, Brian Baker, a senior adviser to the PAC, issued a statement asserting that the race is coming down to a ground game battle for delegates. We will fight for every last delegate vote all the way to Cleveland. Baker also advises the PAC’s biggest donors, the Ricketts family, who had contributed $5 million of the $8 million raised by the PAC through the end of February, and who had come under fire from Trump when their involvement was revealed.

Sources in GOP finance circles said Our Principles has raised at least another $8 million since the end of February, as Trump showed weaknesses in both primaries like Wisconsin and in the delegate game.

New York hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer, who donated $1 million in February, organized a meeting of major donors last month in Palm Beach that, while not billed as an anti-Trump get-together, did include many attendees who are ardently opposed to Trump. The donors got a briefing on the delegate process from Ben Ginsberg, a GOP lawyer who is perhaps the leading expert on the convention rules....

Ginsberg — whose law partner represents Trump’s campaign, but who has said that he is walled off from that work — said of his presentation to the donors “what I told them was exactly what I wrote in a Politico op-ed published March 12.”

But a source familiar with it said many of the donors treated the session as a primer about how they're going to block Trump.”"


Comment: What exactly is the Ricketts family so afraid of? What could be so bad that they're this desperate?

No comments:


Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
I'm the daughter of an Eagle Scout (fan of the Brooklyn Dodgers and Mets) and a Beauty Queen.