10/10/13, "The ocean heat graph (Part 2) – signal or noise?," IPCCReport.wordpress.com
"In Part 1
I showed the ocean heat graph from the (2013) IPCC WG1 SPM, (Summary for Policy Makers) got rather
distracted by the fact that I could not find the Supplementary Material
that supposedly listed the datasets, showed the corresponding graphs
from Chapter 3 and noted that they were described as ‘estimates’ there
but not in the SPM
.
The IPCC graph shows estimated total ocean heat content since 1950, in
units of Joules, with the tick mark intervals on the axis showing an
apparently enormous numbers such as 10^23 Joules. What the IPCC does
not tell the policymakers however, is what this corresponds to in
degrees C. In fact a very simple calculation shows that 10^23 Joules
would correspond to a rise of only about 0.04C.
Lucia Liljegren produced a helpful version of the graph with additional axes showing the corresponding temperatures:
Her version is 0-2000m so is not directly comparable with the IPCC 0-700m one.
It’s no secret that the corresponding temperature increase is only a few hundredths of a degree. The website of the ARGO system
for measuring ocean temperature mentions a temperature change of 0.06C
since the 60s and the Levitus et al paper talks of 0.09C since 1955 in
the abstract. But the IPCC SPM does not mention these small numbers,
talking instead of a 0.11C/decade warming in the upper 75m of the ocean.
These very small temperature variations raise the question of whether
there is any significant meaning in these graphs at all. How large are
the error bars? How accurately can ocean temperature be measured? How
accurately could it be measured in the 1950s? To within a hundredth of a
degree? I think not. As well as the temperature accuracy, there is the
question of coverage. To be able to produce this graph accurately, you
need to measure the temperature all over the ocean and at all depths, at
all times back to the 1950s."...
--------------------
via "Even
if ocean ate the warming, would only change ocean temperature by
IMMEASURABLE hundredths-of-a-degree," Junk Science, Steve Milloy
.
George Soros gave Ivanka's husband's business a $250 million credit line in 2015 per WSJ. Soros is also an investor in Jared's business.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(550)
-
▼
October
(27)
- Smog from China engulfs Korea, Chinese gov. won't ...
- BBC reports global CO2 may be in 'permanent slowdo...
- Japan eases CO2 target though it needs no CO2 targ...
- Solar co. left contaminated, carcinogenic squalor ...
- New $9 billion oil refinery in Vietnam to have 200...
- Britain launches Sharia compliant investment, Came...
- Escalating corruption in science funding in China,...
- Dubai to build $5 billion 'Energy City' in Philipp...
- Greenland votes to allow rare earths mining-Reuters
- Joel Pollak explains why he can't accede to Obama'...
- Heaviest India cyclone casualties averted as India...
- Veterans ralliers carry barricades from Memorial a...
- NY City cab drivers hit with surprise Oct. 1 tax f...
- New peer reviewed study on West Antarctica publish...
- 2013 UN IPCC report scary looking graph about ocea...
- Canadian environmentalist pleads guilty to setting...
- "About 42 percent of active USHCN weather stations...
- Persons with bad credit can be denied health insur...
- In Upstate New York Hillary Clinton praises US inc...
- Number of African billionaires much higher than pr...
- British solar car race entry crashes during test, ...
- Bangladesh Climate Change Trust with $340million i...
- Record-breaking, early October snowfall in US midw...
- GOP 'Congressmen: Do not confuse why you're fighti...
- Peer reviewed 26 year study on East Antarctic ice ...
- Climate terror journalists meet this week to discu...
- UN IPCC dials back ‘extreme weather’ alarmism. Thi...
-
▼
October
(27)
About Me
- susan
- I'm the daughter of a World War II Air Force pilot and outdoorsman who settled in New Jersey.
No comments:
Post a Comment