Move over, Al Gore. That's what happens when Ozone Man sells out to the oil sheikhs...
Apparently immune to the irony, Politico reports that Kerry's "a regular at international conferences, once flying halfway around the globe to spend a few hours on the ground during U.N.-led talks in Bali, Indonesia',"
Climate Depot, Mark Morano
==============================
US CO2 has plunged, is heading lower, is no longer a danger if it ever was, and US energy policy is expected to change to reflect this (links below).
The problem is many billionaires such as Bloomberg, David Rockefeller, and Soros have gambled millions and created entire global personas for themselves based on the belief that this would never happen, ie that the US could no longer be demonized for CO2.
Politico employees side with these billionaires against 'we the people.' No scientific facts justify continuing CO2 terror, so they're left with claiming Obama can "save the world" from CO2. How diseased do you have to be to sell a massive lie? Further, all of this has been thought of by thugs before them:
Global Warming ‘action’ was institutionalized in US government in 1990 by George Bush the 1st in the “U.S. Global Change Research Act of 1990.” CO2 is mentioned near the end.
Devoting 13 federal agencies to ‘climate’ matters is hardly lagging in “action.”
Trillions have been taken from US taxpayers for climate endeavors via agency budget allocations, tax subsidies, diversion of US military to climate or green projects, countless federal regulations, vast sums shipped out in no strings foreign aid for ‘climate’ capacity building, etc.
Other countries’ CO2 hasn’t dropped despite hundreds of billions spent on cap and trade and extra taxes. This isn’t to say the US government hasn’t become business partners with the ‘climate’ industry.
----------------------------------------
8/16/12, “AP IMPACT: CO2 emissions in US drop to 20-year low,” AP, Kevin Begos
“In a surprising turnaround, the amount of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere in the U.S. has fallen dramatically to its lowest level in 20 years, and government officials say the biggest reason is that cheap and plentiful natural gas has led many power plant operators to switch from dirtier-burning coal.
Many of the world’s leading climate scientists didn’t see the drop coming, in large part because it happened as a result of market forces rather than direct government action against carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere....
In a little-noticed technical report, the U.S. Energy Information Agency, a part of the Energy Department, said this month that energy related U.S. CO2 emissions for the first four months of this year fell to about 1992 levels. Energy emissions make up about 98 percent of the total.
The Associated Press contacted environmental experts, scientists and utility companies and learned that
virtually everyone believes the shift could have major long-term implications for U.S. energy policy.”…
-----------------------------------------------------------
6/4/12, “Climate change stunner: USA leads world in CO2 cuts since 2006,” Vancouver Observer, Saxifrage
“Not only that, but as my top chart shows, US CO2 emissions are falling even faster than what President Obama pledged in the global Copenhagen Accord.…
Here is the biggest shocker of all: the average American’s CO2 emissions are down to levels not seen since 1964 --over half a century ago. …Coal is the number two source of CO2 for Americans. Today the average American burns an amount similar to what they did in 1955, and even less than they did in the 1940s. …It is exactly America’s historical role of biggest and dirtiest that
makes their sharp decline in CO2 pollution so noteworthy and potentially game changing at the global level.”...
-------------------------------------
6/22/12, “U.S. cuts greenhouse gases despite do-nothing Congress,” CNN, Steve Hargreaves
- “Even factoring in a stronger economy, forecasters see
- greenhouse gas emissions continuing to fall….
-----------------------------------------------
4/21/12, “Why [CO2] Emissions Are Declining in the U.S. But Not in Europe,” by Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, newgeography.com
.
“As we note below in a new article for Yale360, a funny thing happened: U.S. emissions started
going down in 2005 and are expected to decline further over the next decade.”
- =============================
“What the government has not mandated, the economy is doing on its own: emissions of global warming gases in the United States are down.
According to the Energy Department, carbon dioxide emissions peaked in this country in 2005 and will not reach that level again until the early 2020s.”…
===================================
News of US CO2 plunge has been described as:
- “Surprising,“
- “little noticed,“
- “dramatic,“
- “stunner,“
- “most people are surprised to learn,“
- “quiet but tremendous progress,”
- “major long term implications,”
- “game changing,”
- “shocker,”
- “huge contrast to the forecast.”
1/11/11, “Big Money in Climate Change: Who Gives, Who Gets,” Al Fin
-----------------------------------------
In 2011 alone the US spent “$10.6 million (taxpayer dollars) a day to study, combat, and educate about climate change.” 1/5/11
====================
Cap and Trade is also a massive failure:
11/23/11, “Europe’s $287 billion carbon ‘waste’: UBS report,“ The Australian, by Sid Maher
“SWISS banking giant UBS says the European Union’s emissions trading scheme has cost the continent’s consumers $287 billion for “almost zero impact” on cutting carbon emissions.“…EU CO2 trading provided “windfall profits” to participants paid for by “electricity customers.”“
=========================
5/10/10, "SBY Talks Climate Change With Soros," Jakarta Globe, Camelia Pasandaran
------------------------------------------------------
12/4/2009, "Carbon Capitalists Warming to Climate Market using Derivatives," Bloomberg, by A. Kassenar
"Even George Soros, the billionaire hedge fund operator, says money managers would find ways to manipulate cap-and-trade markets.
“The system can be gamed,” Soros, 79, remarked at a London School of Economics seminar in July.
- “That’s why financial types like me like it -- because there are financial opportunities.”"...
.
No comments:
Post a Comment