News that doesn't receive the necessary attention.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

More problems in Richard Muller BEST data. Climate racket 'high reward, low risk,' make prediction, make hay, and be gone-Climate Audit comment

11/6/11, "BEST Data “Quality”," Climate Audit, Steve McIntyre

"CA (Climate Audit) reader Gary Wescom writes about more data quality problems with the Berkeley temperature study – see here.

In a surprising number of records, the “seasonally adjusted” station data in the Berekely archive contains wildly incorrect data. Gary shows a number of cases, one of which, Longmont 2ESE, outside the nest of climate scientists

  • in Boulder CO, is said to have temperatures
  • below minus 50 deg C in the late fall as shown below...."

Among Comments

"Alex Hayworth

Posted Nov 6, 2011 at 6:58 PM | Permalink | Reply

If this is the BEST, I’d hate to see the worst.

The problem has always been, and will continue to be, that attention to the data is non-sexy. Climate scientists [physicists and others] who use the data want to spend their time making predictions of how we will be roasted in a hundred years time.

  • They will be dead before they are proved wrong,

in the meantime they can make a good career out of being Jeremiahs. Even the ones who are proved wrong, time and again, somehow still seem to keep on sucking on the public teat.

  • Witness Paul Ehrlich."



Posted Nov 6, 2011 at 8:35 PM | Permalink | Reply

It’s not enough to sneer at Climate Scientists, chaps.

  • Clearly there’s something infectious going on."

via Climate Depot

No comments:


Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
I'm the daughter of an Eagle Scout (fan of the Brooklyn Dodgers and Mets) and a Beauty Queen.