Obama says snow must fall and stick above 35 degrees or it's global warming

"President Obama relies on scientists whom he funds to give him the answers he wants. "...For example, Obama says a world skiing event should thrive at above 35 degrees.

• 12/27/10, "Climate Science: the real reason we need to worry," Gordon Fulks, Oregonlive.com

"The simplest solution is to look out the window. The British Met Office, the United Kingdom's national weather service, used its new $50 million super computer to predict a mild winter in Britain, 3.4 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than last year. So far, the reality is record-breaking cold, heavy snow and paralyzing ice.

• But what if the New York Times, President Obama, the National Academy of Sciences, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Yale University, and The Oregonian all say to be very worried? Perhaps you should question their expertise.

President Obama relies on scientists whom he funds to give him the answers he wants.

• The National Academy of Sciences is run to support government programs by an electrical engineer.

He discovered that global warming is far more lucrative than electrical engineering.

The UNIPCC is run by a railroad engineer who writes romance novels. Yale University promoters are really psychologists who want you to believe that they are climate experts when

• their real expertise is propaganda.

The Oregonian relies on all the above.

The interlocking relationships are highly incestuous, with vast conflicts of interest and/or little scientific expertise. Among scientists, belief in global warming comes down to cold cash.

• Those who benefit most from government largesse --

• an estimated $100 billion to date -- are typically true believers,

while independent scientists easily spot the scam.

This creates a split based on age and experience. Young scientists like Juliane Fry of Reed College, who professed her belief in an op-ed in The Oregonian, are eager for fame, funding and tenure,

• all of which are more likely if they support global warming.

Older scientists like Richard Lindzen of MIT, perhaps the greatest meteorologist alive today, oppose climate hysteria. They built their fame on an approach now considered quaint: the scientific method.

Among global warming advocates there is occasional candor about their real goals. Christiana Figueres, the new executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, said of the U.N. climate efforts:

• "This is the greatest societal and economic transformation that the world has ever seen."

Global warming is about politics, not legitimate science. Figueres calls herself a "global climate change analyst." Her formal education in climate science consists of

Al Gore's training program to promote "An Inconvenient Truth."

That should worry everyone."

.

via Tom Nelson