Media Matters has anger management and vocabulary issues in the global warming area

12/16/10, "Why Media Matters doesn't," Green Hell blog by Steve Milloy

"The George Soros-funded, out-to-get-Fox-News and generally-lamebrained Media Matters is claiming that Fox editor Bill Sammon committed the grave felony of urging climate skepticism to Fox staff in a December 2009 e-mail. Sammon, of course, did nothing of the sort. The e-mail in question reads:

“Given the controversy over the veracity of climate change data we should refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question. It is not our place as journalists to assert such notions as facts, especially as this debate intensifies.”

Rather than urging skepticism, Sammon merely advised reporters to treat claims about global warming as what they are — claims that are disputed. Sammon correctly noted that

• a journalist’s job is to report the facts rather than to decide what they are.

This is apparently too a subtle distinction for the comrades at Media Mutters."

####

• 2/13/10, BBC questions Phil Jones. Second to last question is of interest.
  

2/13/10, BBC: "(Question) V - If you have confidence in your science why didn't you come out fighting like the UK government's drugs adviser David Nutt when he was criticised?

(Phil Jones' answer): I don't feel this question merits an answer."...

• Media Matters and others have de facto put the weight of the world on Phil Jones' shoulders. Mr. Jones isn't anxious to carry this weight.
  

Mr. Jones' predicament is acknowledged by a fellow climate scientist in the ClimateGate emails, 10/9/2009, "From: Ben Santer
To: P.Jones
Subject: Re: CEI formal petition to derail EPA GHG endangerment finding with charge that
destruction of CRU raw data undermines integrity of global temperature record.

Dear Phil,

• The only reason these guys are going after you is because your work is of crucial importance -
  

it changed the way the world thinks about human effects on climate."...

Jones himself has not appeared eager to carry the world on his shoulders as much as some wish he would. The BBC and others vigorously claim the science is settled on man made catastrophic, sinking islands, pay up billions, global warming/change. Much of the money extracted from taxpayers is going straight to organized crime, but no one cares.

• It's not about the planet, it's about taking money away from the American middle class.
  

I do not watch Fox News, but if they suggest their staff not say global warming was settled science, or that carbon tax and cap and trade were good things, they would be reflective of Phil Jones' own behavior on the subject.(Since I don't watch, I don't know what Fox has said about ethanol all these years. Al Gore has admitted he lied about it. I wonder if Fox viewed corn-based ethanol as good, bad, or neutral. ed)

UK scientists said 10 years ago that global warming would be proved by an absence of snow in winter. After seeing all the snow in several recent years and having influenced world governments and transfer (robbing) of billions of tax dollars, UK's Royal Meteorological Society is left with no choice but to claim the reverse, ie all the snow is absolute proof of global warming.

3/20/2000, "Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past," Independent UK, Charles Onian. (photo below 11/26/10, car towed in UK in snow, BBC)

• Which is fine but this "science" was used to make US government policy and demand billions in 'reparations' from middle class taxpayers.

• If that isn't a crime, I'd like to know what is. ed.

####

• Related, 6/30/2010, "Environmental reporters, scientists, and government inseparable in global warming hoax, "

Married to the mob, the Washington Post's 'environmental' "reporter" Juliet Eilperin is married to

• Center for American Progess 'Climate' Specialist Andrew Light whose work at CAP's Global Climate Network is
  

• patronized by wealthy UN climate boss/corporate advisor/steamy romance novelist,

Rajendra Pachauri.

• Fittingly, Eilperin hubby Mr. Light's resume says he's an
  

• expert on 'ethics.'....

"Scientists must promote their ideas to politicians and the public in order to create a world that is "ecologically sound, economically feasible

• and socially just," she (Pew fellow Lubchenco) argued." (italics mine, ed.)

• 6/28, "Getting Help from the Press," Gloucester Times, Nancy Gaines

(On top of everything else, it turns out Soros is short.) Below, UN Climate Finance Advisory Panel.



.photo from UN

"Organized crime groups...use the energy sector to progress further towards respectability."...

• The Hague, 8/10/10, "Organized Crime in Energy Supply"

• "What is at stake in the Greens ‘revolution’ is the heart and soul of western civilisation,

built on the Judeo-Christian/Enlightenment synthesis that upholds the individual –with obligations and responsibilities to others, but ultimately judged on his or her own conscience and actions – as the possessor of an inherent dignity and inalienable rights.

• What is also at stake is the economic system that has resulted in the creation of wealth and prosperity for

• the most people in human history."

Reference, BBC interview with Phil Jones, 2/13/10: ""Q and A: Professor Phil Jones," by Roger Harrabin


via Tom Nelson