"In his March 2015 memo Soros further writes that Ukrainian President Poroshenko’s “first priority must be to regain control of financial
markets,” which he assures Poroshenko that Soros would be ready to
assist in: “I am ready to call Jack Lew of the US Treasury to sound him out about the swap agreement.”"...12/6/2015, journal-neo.org
..................................
“It is the degree to which Soros provided finances, logistics, and other support to the Ukrainian coup plotters in 2012, two years before the Euromaidan uprising, that is noteworthy. OSF and its affiliates provided…entire buildings, vehicles, travel to the US.”…Soros “rejected a federalized Ukraine that would grant self-government to the Russian-speaking eastern Donbass region.” US Ambassador to Ukraine suggested federalization to Soros and was thus shipped to another country to be US Ambassador.
8/30/2016, “Soros Ran US Foreign Policy on Post-Coup Ukraine,” Wayne Madsen
[On 8/15/2016 Wikileaks published a link to dcleaks 3000 documents from Soros groups]
“A tranche of some 2500 Internal documents, mostly Microsoft Word, Excel, and Power Point files, as well as pdf files, from George Soros’s Open Society Foundation (OSF) network of non-governmental organizations, which were obtained from the group «DC Leaks», shows that Soros and his advisers lorded over US policy toward Ukraine after the 2014 coup supported by Soros and the Obama administration ousted the democratically-elected Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych and his government. The leaked Soros documents describe how the OSF and Soros’s International Renaissance Foundation (IRF), based at 46 Artema Street in Kiev, worked with the US State Department after the 2014 so-called «Euromaidan» themed revolution
to ensure that a federalized Ukraine was not in the picture.
In addition to George Soros (identified as «GS»in the leaked OSF documents, others involved in the Ukrainian coup planning included
US ambassador to Kiev Geoffrey Pyatt;
David Meale (Economic Counselor to Pyatt);
Yevhen Bystrytsky (Executive Director, IRF);
Oleksandr Sushko (Board Chair, IRF);
Ivan Krastev (Chairman, Centre for Liberal Studies, a Soros- and US government-influenced operation in Sofia, Bulgaria);
Sabine Freizer (OSF); and
Deff Barton (Director, US Agency for International Development (USAID), Ukraine).
USAID is a conduit for the Central Intelligence Agency. Soros was present at a post-coup meeting on March 21, 2014 that involved US support for the «New Ukraine». One document describes the «New Ukraine» as a key measure
to «reshapes the European map by
offering the opportunity to go back to the original essence of European integration».
and rejected a federalized Ukraine that would grant self-government to the Russian-speaking eastern Donbass region.
Soros rejected the proposal because he believed it would grant Russia too much influence in Ukraine.
Although Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland did not attend the March 21 meeting, she remained close to Pyatt and Yatsenyuk, who she affectionately called «Yats».
Petro Poroshenko and his puppet master Soros.
It should be of no surprise that earlier this year [2016], Pyatt was moved from Kiev as ambassador to Athens. One Soros document calls for the need to combat «Russlandversteher», German for «Russia understanding», throughout Europe, particularly in Greece with its history of close cultural and religious relations with Russia. The Soros OSF document calls for
a concerted effort in Greece to influence public opinion against Russia and for the Ukrainian coup government.
Proposed is an anti-Russian and pro-Ukrainian propaganda operation directed against newspapers, ten «audiovisual outlets» (TV and radio), six Internet sites in Greece, and «about 50 opinion leaders» present on Greek social networks.
Greek newspapers targeted for participation in the Soros anti-Russia campaign included
«Kathimerini, Avgi, Ta Nea, Vima, Efymerida Syntakton, Eleutherotypia, Proto Thema, and Rizospastis».
The Greek-Russian Chamber of Commerce in Athens was also targeted for inclusion in the Soros propaganda operation. Similar anti-Russian and pro-Ukrainian coup government media influence operations were proposed for Italy, Spain, and France. The reasoning was to counter any movement to support the status quo ante in Ukraine by the SYRIZA, Podemos, and Five Star Movement parties in Greece, Spain, and Italy, respectively. This Soros strategy was referred to as «debate mapping».
While looking to influence Greek policy on Ukraine, Soros and his NGO gang pushed for European Union enlargement to include Ukraine and Turkey, neither country’s accession to the EU being in the interests of any of the EU’s member states. High priority was also given to integrating Moldova into EU structures. The overall theme of many of the Soros documents is that lying at the heart of «Russlandversteher» is «anti-American» feelings in Europe. European trade unions are singled out by the Soros gang as being at the heart of «anti-American» opinions in Europe. Certain political parties are also singled out, including the National Front of France, Jobbik of Hungary, the Netherlands Party of Freedom (PVV), and the UK Independence Party (UKIP), and are referred to by Soros as the «PRR», or «populist radical right».
Pro-Russian German politicians are named in the Soros documents and they include
Chancellors Gerhard Schröder,
Helmut Kohl, and
Helmut Schmidt;
Brandenburg Minister-President Matthias Platzeck;
Die Linke leaders Gregor Gysi, Sahra Wagenknecht, and Katja Kipping, and
former Hamburg mayor Klaus von Dohnanyi.
Soros, who cut his teeth as a teen in Hungary cooperating with the Nazi Gestapo and Hungarian fascist Arrow Cross, prefers to maintain «hit lists» containing the names of his opponents.
It is the degree to which Soros provided finances, logistics, and other support to the Ukrainian coup plotters
in 2012, two years before the Euromaidan uprising,
that is noteworthy. OSF and its affiliates provided
and other material for the Euromaidan uprising.
This was all done with the cooperation of
the US and Swedish embassies in Kiev,
the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA), and
the Central Intelligence Agency-linked
National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
that had to be approved by Soros operatives before publication.
One major collaborator of Soros and the United States in pushing Ukrainian propaganda was identified as the Hromadske Television, which was singled out for its work to counter «Russian propaganda».
One Soros document contains the following recommendation:
«Select journalists from the 5 target countries (Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Greece) and offer them long stay reporting trips in Ukraine. Rather than specify what they should write about they should make suggestions for articles; we retain a veto on stories we think are counterproductive. Suggestion that we liaise directly with journalists to determine interest».The Soros document even concedes that such as approach is not «proper independent journalism and we may damage our credibility with journalists».
Soros’s people proposed a «firewall» between Soros and journalists reporting on Ukraine. Soros’s organization proposed that
«a third party would receive the grant and act as the intermediary, editor, quality control etc
IRF [International Renaissance Foundation] should play a more lead role in this initiative to emphasize its Ukraine origins». The Soros organization decided to pursue «PIJ», or «public interest journalism» outlets for a cooperative propaganda dissemination relationship regarding Ukraine.
There are a number of journalists around the world who have sold their journalistic professional credentials and credibility to the devil and have willingly
accepted paychecks from Soros in order to disseminate
One such outlet that is cited as carrying Soros’s water is Huffington Post-Germany, which is identified as a collaborator of Burda, a center-right publishing house in Germany.
Other German publications that Soros favorably viewed as pushing the anti-Russian line on Ukraine included
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Frankfurter Rundschau, Die Welt, Süddeutche Zeitung, Tageszeitung, Spiegel, and Junge Welt.
Coming in for criticism by Soros was Neues Deutschland and Freitag, cited as being too friendly to Russia and anti-Ukraine.
The Soros documents identify a columnist for the Swiss paper Neue Zürcher Zeitung as receiving Soros money to hire a «research assistant» to promulgate pro-Ukraine propaganda. Others on Soros’s anti-Russia payroll and who authored Ukraine propaganda articles included
researchers with the Barcelona Institute of International Studies,
[of which the Queen is patron. Its website’s 3/8/22 headline is, “Devising the strategy to deter Russia and weaken Putin.“... “US [taxpayers] has played a major role in this effort, sending part of the 82nd Airborne Division to Poland and redeploying US Strycker brigades from Germany and Italy to the Baltic statesand Romania–-surpassing all the European efforts combined. NATO has also mobilized its high-readiness Reaction Force for the first time
and aims to establish
four new
multinational battalions in the Black Sea region
with France offering to lead the Romania one. Although most deployments are temporary, the receiving allies
would understandably like NATO to commit to permanent stationed forces…
Finally, there must be a plan to contain and constrain Russia as mixing competitiveness with partnerships and cooperation now needs to be abandoned, along with hopes that cooperation outside Europe in areas such as Afghanistan, piracy, or the Iran nuclear issue would dampen the Kremlin’s determination to overturn the European security order.” What exactly would be wrong with that? Where is it written that your “security order” however you define it, likely set up after WWII, should be permanent?]
(continuing): “and the Istituto Affari Internazionali in Italy.
Propaganda memes cited by Soros’s gang included
NATO military support and
NATO membership for Ukraine, and
sanctions against Russia.
A Confidential March 12, 2015, Soros document reveals that the anti-Russian former NATO military commander and close friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, Wesley Clark, in addition to Polish General Waldemar Skrzypczak,
advised Poroshenko on military matters regarding Russia.
The document cites Soros as the «self-appointed advocate of the New Ukraine».
Soros is one of the closest advisers and financiers of Hillary Clinton. The leaked Soros documents describe how
the Clinton Global Initiative and Soros Foundation cooperates on undermining
the sovereignty of nations around the world,
including those in Europe. And that relationship should weigh heavily on every American on November 8 [2016].”
………………………………………
Added: 8/19/2016, “The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents,“ Investors Editorial
“The mainstream press has completely ignored the leak of thousands of eye-opening documents that expose Soros’ far-flung efforts to push his leftist views in the U.S. and abroad.
Leaked documents released a few days ago provide juicy insider details of how a fabulously rich businessman has been using his money to influence elections in Europe, underwrite an extremist group, target U.S. citizens who disagreed with him, dictate foreign policy, and try to sway a Supreme Court ruling, among other things. Pretty compelling stuff, right?
Not if it involves leftist billionaire George Soros. In this case, the mainstream press couldn’t care less.
On Saturday, a group called DC Leaks posted more than 2,500 documents going back to 2008 that it pilfered from Soros’ Open Society Foundations’ servers. Since then, the mainstream media have shown zero interest in this gold mine of information.
We couldn’t find a single story on the New York Times, CNN, Washington Post, CBS News or other major news sites that even noted the existence of these leaked documents, let alone reported on what’s in them.
Indeed, the only news organization that appears to be diligently sifting through all the documents is the conservative Daily Caller which as a result has filed a series of eye-opening reports.
So what could possibly explain the mainstream media’s disinterest?
Is the problem that the material is too boring or inconsequential? Hardly.
As we noted in this space on Monday, the leaked documents show how Soros’ far-flung international organizations attempted to manipulate Europe’s 2014 elections. The “List of European Elections 2014 Projects” details over 90 Soros efforts he had under way that year.
The documents reveal that Soros has poured nearly $4 million into anti-Israel groups, with a goal of “challenging Israel’s racist and anti-democratic policies.”
Here at home, they show that Soros proposed paying the Center for American Politics $200,000 to conduct a smear campaign against conservative activists.
More recently, an October 15 document came to light showing that Soros’ Open Society U.S. Programs had donated $650,000 to “invest in technical assistance and support for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement.“ Since then, several BLM protests have turned violent.
That same document details how this group successfully used its “extensive networks” to pressure the Obama administration into increasing the number of refugees it would take to 100,000, despite concerns that Islamic terrorists could use the refugee program to infiltrate the U.S.
A separate memo details how Soros tried to use his clout to sway Supreme Court justices into approving President Obama’s unilateral effort to rewrite immigration law. “Grantees are seeking
to influence the Justices
(primarily via a sophisticated amicus briefs and media strategy
in hopes of securing a favorable ruling in U.S. v Texas,“ the memo, dug up by the Daily Caller.
Anyone with this much power and influence demands close media scrutiny. Particularly when he has extremely close ties to the would-be next president of the United States.
This year alone, Soros has given $7 million to the Clinton-supporting Priorities USA super-PAC, and a total of $25 million to support Democrats and their causes, according to Politico.
And when Soros speaks, Clinton listens. A separate email released by WikiLeaks shows Soros giving what read like step-by-step instructions to then-Secretary of State Clinton on how to deal with unrest in Albania in early 2011, including a list of people who should be considered as candidates to become an official mediator sent to that country.
Days later, the EU dispatched one of the people on Soros’ list.
Thomas Lifson, writing in the American Thinker blog, said “Soros got the U.S. and other accomplices to intervene in the internal affairs of a sovereign state…. How is this not huge news?”
How, indeed.
If Soros were a rock-ribbed conservative who supported Republican candidates and causes, you can bet that a swarm of reporters would right now be lustily tearing into these documents determined to expose any and every shred of evidence of influence peddling and misdeeds.
But because Soros is a hard-core leftist, he apparently gets a pass. Shameful.”
RELATED:
..............................
Added:
In 2015 Jared Kushner's business accepted a $250 million credit line from convicted felon, George Soros, who is also an investor in Jared's business....May 3, 2017, "Trump Adviser Kushner’s Undisclosed Partners Include Goldman and Soros," Wall St. Journal, by Jean Eaglesham, Juliet Chung, Lisa Schwartz...10/28/2004, Trump himself accepted a $160 million loan from Soros to build his Chicago hotel....5/25/20, “It’s really up in the air whether two or four or whatever years of Biden is better or worse than four years of Jared.” Scott McConnell twitter
................
No comments:
Post a Comment