9/7/15, "An Open Letter To Jonah Goldberg – RE: The GOP and Donald Trump," the conservative treehouse, sundance
"A few days ago I took the time to read your expressed concerns
about the support you see for Donald Trump and the state of current
conservative opinion. Toward that end I have also noted additional
media present a similar argument, and I took the time to consider.
While we are of far lesser significance and influence, I hope you
will consider this retort with the same level of consideration afforded
toward your position.
The challenging aspect to your expressed opinion, and perhaps why
there is a chasm between us, is you appear to stand in defense of a
Washington DC conservatism that no longer exists.
I hope you will indulge these considerations and correct me where I’m wrong.
On December 23rd 2009 Harry Reid passed a version of Obamacare
through forced vote at 1:30am. The Senators could not leave, and for
the two weeks previous were kept in a prolonged legislative session
barred returning to their home-state constituencies. It was, by all
measures and reality, a vicious display of forced ideological
manipulation of the upper chamber. I share this reminder only to set
the stage for what was to follow.
Riddled with anxiety we watched the Machiavellian manipulations
unfold, seemingly unable to stop the visible usurpation. Desperate for
a tool to stop the construct we found Scott Brown and rallied to
deliver $7 million in funding, and a “Kennedy Seat” victory on January
Unfortunately, the trickery of Majority Leader Harry Reid would not
be deterred. Upon legislative return he stripped a House Budgetary
bill, and replaced it with the Democrat Senate version of Obamacare
through a process of “reconciliation”. Thereby avoiding the 3/5ths vote
rule (60) and instead using only a simple majority, 51 votes.
Angered, we rallied to the next election (November 2010) and handed
the usurping Democrats the single largest electoral defeat in the prior
100 years. The House returned to Republican control, and one-half of
the needed Senate seats reversed. Within the next two election cycles
(’12 and ’14) we again removed the Democrats from control of the Senate.
Within each of those three elections we were told Repealing Obamacare
would be job #1. It was not an optional part of our representative
agreement to do otherwise.
From your own writing:
"[…] If you want a really good sense of the damage Donald
Trump is doing to conservatism, consider the fact that for the last
five years no issue has united the Right more than opposition to
Obamacare. Opposition to socialized medicine in general has been a core
tenet of American conservatism from Day One. Yet, when Republicans were
told that Donald Trump favors single-payer health care, support for
single-payer health care jumped from 16 percent to 44 percent. (link)"
With control of the House and Senate did Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell or House Speaker John Boehner use the same level of severity
expressed by Harry Reid to put a repeal bill on the desk of Obama for
Why not? According to you it’s the “core tenet of American conservatism”.
If for nothing but to accept and follow the will of the people. Despite the probability of an Obama veto, this was not a matter of
option. While the method might have been “symbolic”, due to the almost
guaranteed veto, it would have stood as a promise fulfilled.
Yet you speak of “core tenets” and question our “trust” of Donald Trump?
We are not blind to the maneuverings of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
and President Tom Donohue. We are fully aware the repeal vote did not
take place because the U.S. CoC demanded the retention of Obamacare.
Leader McConnell followed the legislative priority of Tom Donohue as
opposed to the will of the people. This was again exemplified with the
passage of TPPA, another Republican construct which insured the
Trans-Pacific Trade Deal could pass the Senate with 51 votes instead of
We are not blind to the reality that when McConnell chooses to change the required voting threshold he is apt to do so. Not
coincidentally, the TPP trade deal is another legislative priority of
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Yet you question the “trustworthiness” of Donald Trump’s conservatism?
Another bill, the Iran “agreement”, reportedly and conveniently not
considered a “treaty”, again we are not blind. Nor are we blind to
Republican Bob Corker’s amendment (Corker/Cardin Amendment) changing ratification to a 67-vote-threshold for denial, as opposed to a customary 67 vote threshold for passage. A profound difference.
Yet you question the “ideological conservative principle” of Donald Trump?
Perhaps your emphasis is on the wrong syllable. Perhaps you should
be questioning the “ideological conservative principle” of Mitch
McConnell, or Bob Corker; both of whom apparently working to deny the
will of the electorate within the party they are supposed to
represent. Of course, this would force you to face some uncomfortable
empirical realities. I digress.
Another example – How “conservative” is Lisa Murkowski? A senator
who can lose her Republican primary bid, yet run as a write-in
candidate, and return to the Senate with full seniority and committee
Did Reince Preibus, or a republican member of leadership meet the
returning Murkowski and demand a Pledge of Allegiance to the principles
within the Republican party?
Yet you question the “allegiances” of Donald Trump?
Perhaps within your purity testing you need to forget minority leader
Mitch McConnell working to re-elect Senator Thad Cochran, fundraising
on his behalf in the spring/summer of 2014, even after Cochran lost the
first Mississippi primary?
Perhaps you forget the NRSC spending money on racist attack ads?
Perhaps you forget the GOP paying Democrats to vote in the second
primary to defeat Republican Chris McDaniel. The “R” in NRSC is
Perhaps you forget. We do not.
Yet you question the “principle” of those who have had enough, and are willing to support candidate Donald Trump.
You describe yourself as filled with anxiety because such supporters
do not pass some qualified “principle” test?
Tell that to the majority
of Republicans who supported Chris McDaniel and found their own party
actively working against them.
Principle? You claim “character matters” as part of this
consideration. Where is the “character” in the fact-based exhibitions
Remember Virginia 2012, 2013? When the conservative principle-driven
electorate changed the method of candidate selection to a convention
and removed the party stranglehold on their “chosen candidates”. Remember that? We do.
What did McConnell, the RNC and the GOP do in response with Ken
Cuccinelli, they actively spited him and removed funding from his
campaign. To teach us a lesson? Well it worked, we learned that
Representative David Brat was part of that lesson learned and answer
delivered. Donald Trump is part of that lesson learned and answer
forthcoming – yet you speak of “character”.
You speak of being concerned about Donald Trump’s hinted tax
proposals. Well, who cut the tax rates on lower margins by 50% thereby
removing any tax liability from the bottom 20% wage earners? While
simultaneously expanding the role of government dependency programs?
That would be the GOP (“Bush Tax Cuts”)
What? How dare you argue against tax cuts, you say. The “Bush Tax
Cuts” removed tax liability from the bottom 20 to 40% of income earners
completely. Leaving the entirety of tax burden on the upper 60% wage
earners. Currently, thanks to those cuts, 49% of tax filers pay ZERO federal income tax.
But long term it’s much worse. The “Bush Tax Cuts” were, in essence,
created to stop the post 9/11/01 recession – and they contained a
“sunset provision” which ended ten years later specifically because the
tax cuts were unsustainable.
The expiration of the lower margin tax cuts then became an argument
in the election cycle of 2012. And as usual, the GOP, McConnell and
Boehner were insufferably inept during this process.
The GOP (2002) removed tax liability from the lower income levels,
and President Obama then (2009) lowered the income threshold for
economic subsidy (welfare, food stamps, ebt, medicaid, etc) this was
This lower revenue higher spending approach means
– lower tax
revenues and increased pressure on the top tax rates (wage earners) with
the increased demand for tax spending created within the welfare
Republicans focus on the “spending” without ever admitting
they, not the Democrats, lowered rates and set themselves up to be
played with the increased need for social program spending,
simultaneously. Is this reality/outcome not ultimately a “tax the rich” program?
As a consequence what’s the difference between the Republicans and
Democrats on taxes? All of a sudden Republicans are arguing to
“broaden the tax base”. Meaning, reverse the tax cuts they created on
the lower income filers? This is a conservative position now? A need
to “tax the poor”? Nice of the Republicans to insure the Democrats have
an atomic sledgehammer to use against them.
This is a winning strategy? This is the “conservatism” you are
defending because you are worried about Donald Trump’s principles,
character or trustworthiness.
Here’s a list of those modern conservative “small(er) government” principles:
• Did the GOP secure the border with control of the White House and Congress? NO.
• Did the GOP balance the budget with control of the White House and Congress? NO.
• Who gave us the TSA? The GOP
• Who gave us the Patriot Act? The GOP
• Who expanded Medicare to include prescription drug coverage? The GOP
• Who created the precursor of “Common Core” in “Race To the Top”? The GOP
• Who played the race card in Mississippi to re-elect Thad Cochran? The GOP
• Who paid Democrats to vote in the Mississippi primary? The GOP
• Who refused to support Ken Cuccinnelli in Virginia? The GOP
• Who supported Charlie Crist? The GOP
• Who supported Arlen Spector? The GOP
• Who supported Bob Bennett? The GOP
• Who worked against Marco Rubio? The GOP
• Who worked against Rand Paul? The GOP
• Who worked against Ted Cruz? The GOP
• Who worked against Mike Lee? The GOP
• Who worked against Jim DeMint? The GOP
• Who worked against Ronald Reagan? The GOP
• Who said “I think we are going to crush [the Tea Party] everywhere.”? The GOP (McConnell)
And, you wonder why we’re frustrated, desperate for a person who can
actually articulate some kind of push-back? Mitch McConnell and John
Boehner are what the GOP give us? SERIOUSLY?
Which leads to the next of your GOP talking points. Where you opine on Fox:
“Politics is a game where you don’t get everything you want”
Fair enough. But considering we of questionable judgment have simply
been demanding common sense, ie. fiscal discipline, a BUDGET would be
The last federal budget was passed in September of 2007, and EVERY
FLIPPING INSUFFERABLE YEAR we have to go through the predictable fiasco
of a Government Shutdown Standoff and/or a Debt Ceiling increase specifically because there is NO BUDGET!
That’s a strategy?
That’s the GOP strategy? Essentially: Lets plan for an annual
battle against articulate Democrats and Presidential charm, using a
creepy guy who cries and another old mumbling fool who dodders, knowing
full well the MSM is on the side of the other guy to begin with?
THAT’S YOUR GOP STRATEGY?
Don’t tell me it’s not, because if it wasn’t there’d be something else being done – there isn’t.
And don’t think we don’t know the 2009 “stimulus” became embedded in
the baseline of the federal spending, and absent of an actual budget it
just gets spent and added to the deficit each year, every year. Yet
this is somehow smaller fiscal government?
...And you're worried about what Donald Trump might do?
"Unaccompanied Minors," June 2014
June 2014, "Unaccompanied minor"
6/6/2014, "Sickening Photos Of The Humanitarian Crisis At US Border Detention Centers," Business Insider, Brett LoGiurato
Anonymous commenter to Conservative Treehouse Open Letter to Jonah Goldberg notes ongoing war no one mentions. (Well, except Jeb Bush, who wrote and toured with his book "Immigration Wars" in 2013. Unfortunately, what's happening isn't immigration, it's invasion.)
"Clearly the most important danger we are facing is this unfettered invasion on our southern border. This is
ultimately a national defense issue, we have been in a war that we do
not seem to care to recognize, a war that will destroy our nation, our
property, our beliefs, our way of life, our right to self
representation, our right to control our govt, and our own destiny.
Donald Trump is addressing this and providing us with the tough
politically incorrect solutions that will be necessary to put an end to
this. In the same vein, he is also addressing the threats coming from
the middle east as well....It is Donald Trump who is stepping up."
Image of Jeb Bush book from Amazon
The GOP E figured, who's going to stop us? We just say poof, you people are animals, or, if you want, slaves. Take your pick.
Dr. Angelo Codevilla notes in any case, we've been cut loose:
2/20/13, "As Country Club Republicans Link Up With The Democratic Ruling Class, Millions Of Voters Are Orphaned," Angelo Codevilla, Forbes
"Increasingly the top
people in government, corporations, and the media collude and demand
submission as did the royal courts of old."...
News that doesn't receive the necessary attention.
- ► 2017 (654)
- ► 2016 (1320)
- Donald Trump takes lead in Wisconsin, Marquette Po...
- Donald Trump strengthens lead in USA Today nationa...
- Islamic island of Maldives in Indian Ocean that fl...
- Trump expands lead to 26 in North Carolina Public ...
- Saudi Arabia inflicts punishments similar to those...
- Trump at 30 is double Republican field in latest M...
- Royal Dutch Shell stops Arctic activity after 'dis...
- John Kerry and Chris Matthews, how many Syrian ref...
- Donald Trump on 60 Minutes: America needs Fair Tra...
- Donald Trump up two points from July in NBC WSJ po...
- In 1984 Pres. Reagan established full US diplomati...
- Apparently not enough global warming in Finland, M...
- Donald Trump continues to hold significant lead am...
- To the Pope: Why don't you quit your job and take ...
- Trump leads Republican field by 5 points in latest...
- US government funneled $1.2 billion US taxpayer do...
- 40% expect Trump to be Republican nominee for pres...
- Donald Trump at 31.5 wins Florida poll of Likely R...
- Trump tops Republican field at 26 in post CNN deba...
- Climate Action prayers answered: Arctic Sea Ice Ex...
- To the Pope and his pals in the US Ruling Class: '...
- Pope exits Giant Airbus, gets in tiny symbolic car...
- Pope Francis took a complete pass on calling out r...
- Donald Trump increases lead in Iowa per Public Pol...
- Trump twenty points ahead of Republican field at 3...
- Desperately seeking some global warming drought in...
- Plurality of Florida Republican voters think Jeb B...
- Zogby Poll: Trump widens lead after CNN debate to ...
- Trump: Christians need support
- Arctic Sea Ice Extent greater than 30% concentrati...
- Donald Trump increases lead after CNN debate as fi...
- Just in time for election of first George Bush in ...
- Wednesday Republican debate most watched program i...
- Trump wins 2nd Republican Debate per Drudge Report...
- Six inches of snow expected in Idaho, September 20...
- Trump leads in Arizona with nearly 30% of likely R...
- Trump leads in California among registered Republi...
- Before speaking to crowd of 20,000, Trump met with...
- Despite promises by Indonesian government to preve...
- Donald Trump soars to 33 points in new Washington ...
- The Trump Fight Song (Unofficial)
- In victory for beekeepers, San Francisco Federal A...
- World Trade Center Jumpers, September 11, 2001
- Donald Trump leads with 37% in new South Carolina ...
- Hungarian Bishop disputes Pope Francis on so-calle...
- An Open Letter to Jonah Goldberg re: The GOP and D...
- Trump up in both Iowa and New Hampshire, +7 in Iow...
- Unsettled science causes Wall St. losses in tax-ad...
- Why are oil-rich Arab countries abandoning Muslim ...
- ▼ September (49)
- ► 2014 (456)
- ► 2013 (550)
- ► 2012 (611)
- ► 2011 (487)
- ► 2010 (337)
- ► 2009 (33)