George Soros gave Ivanka's husband's business a $250 million credit line in 2015 per WSJ. Soros is also an investor in Jared's business.

Showing posts sorted by relevance for query danforth. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query danforth. Sort by date Show all posts

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Clearing a path for the radical left, former Senator John Danforth, Rockefeller Republican

In March 2012 former US Senator John Danforth and a Bush family cousin among others engaged in a last minute sabotage attack against a slate of three Republican primary candidates running for the US Senate nomination from Missouri 5 months before the August 7, 2012 election.
 
Danforth and his group had a 4th prospective candidate in mind, Danforth friend and former Bush administration State Dept. official Thomas Schweich.
 

2012 was Danforth’s second attempt to trash incipient normal functioning of a Missouri US Senate GOP primary by promoting his friend Schweich, the first being in 2009.
.
The three candidates in 2012 had been running for months, one was a sitting congressman who’d been re-elected 5 times, one had won statewide election before, and one was self -financed and strongly endorsed by the US Chamber of Commerce. The Danforth group’s “open letter” was provided to the media and promoted a prospective fourth candidate they said would have the best chance to win (“nothing against anyone else”). Obviously a 4th candidate  would further splinter the vote. Danforth’s clear implication was the 3 GOP candidates were so bad he needed to interrupt their campaign and momentum. In the meantime, his candidate just needs a couple weeks to decide for sure if he’ll run. The Danforth group could’ve worked behind the scenes lining up donors, preparing their potential candidate, and when all was in place announce his addition before the March 27 filing deadline. As it turned out, Danforth candidate Tom Schweich, ended up announcing on March 20 that 
  • he wouldn’t be running after all. 
The result of Danforth’s action was to take two weeks of momentum away from the existing GOP slate, humiliate them, interrupt and diminish their fundraising, make the GOP look like an unprincipled collection of mental cases, deter good people from attempting to become GOP candidates, and harm the entire country. Clearly this isn’t Mr. Danforth’s preoccupation, but harming the GOP harms America. The Republican Party is the only vehicle available to turn back the radical left in the US. The candidate who was a sitting Congressman said of Danforth’s purported rescue of the GOP from allegedly weak candidates: 

“The field is anything but weak. In fact, I would say it is too strong for many powerful people in the liberal wing of the Republican Party.”
.
The candidate, Todd Akin also said he considered Danforth a friend. (Contrary to media headlines, Akin wasn’t a “Tea Party candidate.“ Tea Party groups and Sarah Palin supported his two opponents, Steelman and Brunner. The GOP establishment actually gave Akin his start in politics in 1987. In 2010 he was re-elected for the 5th time with 67.9% of the vote. The House ‘Tea Party Caucus‘ didn’t exist until July 19, 2010). 

Publicly sabotaging  entire slates of GOP candidates late in campaigns obviously weakens all the candidates and increases likelihood of a democrat winning. Which is likely what you have in mind when you publicly announce that today’s GOP  
calling for push back of Republican and Conservative Christians. (p. 5).

Danforth’s book, “Faith and Politics“ asks, “Are Christians reconcilers or dividers?“ I guess he’s talking about pesky Christians who weren’t slaughtered by Islamic terrorists on 9/11/2001. 

Some say the GOP wants polished candidates but their actions say otherwise. They let many months go by in which they could’ve coached any of the 2012 Missouri US Senate primary candidates. Instead they tried to make GOP candidates much weaker. This doesn’t even get into Danforth’s disrespect for the time and money invested by candidates, their staffs, families, and donors. Citizens concerned about Missouri and the country may have sacrificed to donate to one of the GOP candidates Danforth smeared. He threw an entire election into disarray. Thanks to Danforth, the idea of  “weak GOP candidates” was pounded into the electorate’s mind for 2 weeks. Then Danforth and his establishment cronies were gone leaving Missourians with the knowledge that the United States has only one functioning political party, the radical left democrats.
  • ============================
In the 2010 US Senate race Missouri Republican Roy Blunt defeated “household Democrat name” Robin Carnahan by 14 points. This was despite a May 2009 sabotage attempt by Danforth. Rep. Roy Blunt had already announced his candidacy and sitting Missouri Senator Kit Bond had endorsed him. Danforth hit town and directly rebuked Congressman Roy Blunt’s candidacy and the endorsement given him only days earlier by current Missouri US Senator Kit Bond, presenting his friend and former Bush administration State Dept. official Thomas Schweich as “an alternative” to beat Democrat Carnahan. Despite Danforth’s efforts, Roy Blunt beat Democrat Carnahan by 14 points:

5/11/2009, “Danforth Lends Credibility to Schweich,” ky3.blogspot.com 


”Former Senator John Danforth’s endorsement of St. Louis law professor Thomas Schweich for U.S. Senate gives the little known former U.S. ambassador an initial jolt of credibility among top tier Republicans who remain uneasy about next year’s election prospects.  

Schweich is not well known outside of St. Louis political circles, but Danforth’s strong backing of his former chief of staff is grabbing the attention of GOP leaders, donors and consultants across the state….
 
It’s a direct rebuke of Congressman Roy Blunt’s candidacy and a clear separation from the current incumbent, Sen. Kit Bond, who just tossed his official blessing to Blunt on Friday. If there was any doubt that   
about how to best defeat Robin Carnahan next year, Monday’s news should rest the case. “I think we have a better chance at keeping Senator Bond’s seat with Tom Schweich than anyone else I can think of,” Danforth said.”…
  • ---------------------------------
Danforth’s 2009 and 2012 sabotage attempts naturally elicited negative publicity about the GOP:
Danforth on behalf of “his” party, makes excellent use of his high profile to attack Republicans and conservative Christians (“I’m counting on nausea.”) in such venues as the NY Times, the Washington Post, a radio broadcast, and even a 2006 book timed to negatively effect Republicans (p. 5)  in the midterm elections.
The GOP as exemplified by Danforth has shown by their actions that life under radical left democrats is fine with them. Following is a partial Danforth chronology:




  • ============================ 

Friday, April 25, 2014

No other conclusion can be drawn but the Bush family and its GOP Ruling Class cronies are dedicated to destroying the Republican Party and the country, their sabotage of 2012 Missouri GOP primary just one of many examples

Bush crony sabotage of 2012 Missouri Republican primary detailed below following erroneous Washington Examiner claim to the contrary:

4/24/14, "GOP rallies behind Thom Tillis but the hits keep coming," Washington Examiner, Rebecca Berg

"The national Republican Party and its network of supportive third-party groups have aggressively worked to correct their mistakes from the last election cycle.

No longer is the party content to sit idly by and let the primary play out as it will, as it did in states such as Missouri in 2012, to disastrous effect in the general election.".... 
.
=======================

For Washington Examiner's information:

Danforth
In March 2012 former US Senator John Danforth along with a Bush family cousin among others engaged in a last minute sabotage attack against a slate of three Republican primary candidates running for the US Senate nomination from Missouri 5 months before the August 7, 2012 primary election.

Danforth and his group had a 4th prospective candidate in mind, Danforth friend and former Bush administration State Dept. official Thomas Schweich. 


2012 was Danforth’s second attempt to trash incipient normal functioning of a Missouri US Senate GOP primary by promoting his friend Schweich, the first being in 2009.
  
The three candidates in 2012 had been running for months, one was a sitting congressman who’d been re-elected 5 times, one had won statewide election before, and one was self-financed and strongly endorsed by the US Chamber of Commerce. The Danforth group’s “open letter” was provided to the media and promoted a prospective fourth candidate they said would have the best chance to win (“nothing against anyone else”). Obviously a 4th candidate  would further splinter the vote. Danforth’s clear implication was the 3 GOP candidates were so bad he needed to interrupt their campaign and momentum. In the meantime, his candidate just needs a couple weeks to decide for sure if he’ll run. The Danforth group could’ve worked behind the scenes lining up donors, preparing their potential candidate, and when all was in place announce his addition before the March 27 filing deadline. As it turned out, Danforth candidate Tom Schweich, ended up announcing on March 20 that

  • he wouldn’t be running after all.
The result of Danforth’s action was to take two weeks of momentum away from the existing GOP slate, humiliate them, interrupt and diminish their fundraising, make the GOP look like an unprincipled collection of mental cases, deter good people from attempting to become GOP candidates, and harm the entire country. Clearly this isn’t Mr. Danforth’s preoccupation, but harming the GOP harms America. The Republican Party is the only vehicle available to turn back the radical left in the US. The candidate who was a sitting Congressman said of Danforth’s purported rescue of the GOP from allegedly weak candidates: 

The candidate, Todd Akin also said he considered Danforth a friend. (Contrary to media headlines, Akin wasn’t a “Tea Party candidate.“ Tea Party groups and Sarah Palin supported his two opponents, Steelman and Brunner. The GOP establishment actually gave Akin his start in politics in 1987. In 2010 he was re-elected for the 5th time with 67.9% of the vote. The House ‘Tea Party Caucus‘ didn’t exist until July 19, 2010). Publicly sabotaging  entire slates of GOP candidates late in campaigns obviously weakens all the candidates and increases likelihood of a democrat winning. Which is likely what you have in mind when you publicly announce that today’s GOP
    calling for push back against Republican and Conservative Christians. (p. 5).

    Danforth’s book, “Faith and Politics“ asks, “Are Christians reconcilers or dividers?“ I guess he’s talking about pesky Christians who weren’t slaughtered by Islamic terrorists on 9/11/2001. 

    Some say the GOP wants polished candidates but their actions say otherwise. They let many months go by in which they could’ve coached any of the 2012 Missouri US Senate primary candidates. Instead they tried to make GOP candidates much weaker. This doesn’t even get into Danforth’s disrespect for the time and money invested by candidates, their staffs, families, and donors. Citizens concerned about Missouri and the country may have sacrificed to donate to one of the GOP candidates Danforth smeared. He threw an entire election into disarray. Thanks to Danforth, the idea of  “weak GOP candidates” was pounded into the electorate’s mind for 2 weeks. Then Danforth and his establishment cronies were gone leaving Missourians with the knowledge that the United States has only one functioning political party, the radical left democrats.

    • ============================
    In the 2010 US Senate race Missouri Republican Roy Blunt defeated “household Democrat name” Robin Carnahan by 14 points. This was despite a May 2009 sabotage attempt by Danforth. Rep. Roy Blunt had already announced his candidacy and sitting Missouri Senator Kit Bond had endorsed him. Danforth hit town and directly rebuked Congressman Roy Blunt’s candidacy and the endorsement given him only days earlier by current Missouri US Senator Kit Bond, presenting his friend and former Bush administration State Dept. official Thomas Schweich as “an alternative” to beat Democrat Carnahan. Despite Danforth’s efforts, Roy Blunt beat Democrat Carnahan by 14 points:

    5/11/2009, “Danforth Lends Credibility to Schweich,” ky3.blogspot.com
    . 
    "Former Senator John Danforth’s endorsement of St. Louis law professor Thomas Schweich for U.S. Senate gives the little known former U.S. ambassador an initial jolt of credibility among

    • top tier Republicans who remain uneasy about next year’s election prospects.
    Schweich is not well known outside of St. Louis political circles, but Danforth’s strong backing of his former chief of staff is

    • grabbing the attention of GOP leaders, donors and consultants across the state….
    It’s a direct rebuke of Congressman Roy Blunt’s candidacy and a clear separation from the current incumbent, Sen. Kit Bond, who just tossed his official blessing to Blunt on Friday. If there was any doubt that

    about how to best defeat Robin Carnahan next year, Monday’s news should rest the case. “I think we have a better chance at keeping Senator Bond’s seat with Tom Schweich than anyone else I can think of,” Danforth said.”…

    • ================================
    Danforth’s 2009 and 2012 sabotage attempts naturally elicited negative publicity about the GOP:

    Danforth on behalf of “his” party, makes excellent use of his high profile to attack Republicans and conservative Christians (“I’m counting on nausea.”) in such venues as the NY Times, the Washington Post, a radio broadcast, and even a 2006 book timed to negatively effect Republicans (p. 5)  in the midterm elections.

    The GOP as exemplified by Danforth is determined to destroy the US two party system. Following is a partial Danforth career chronology:

    Friday, September 18, 2015

    Just in time for election of first George Bush in 1988, total control of televised candidate debates including composition of the audience was ceded entirely to the Republican and Democrat parties-League of Women Voters press release, 10/3/1988

    Republican and Democrat parties demanded total control of televised debates including "selection of questioners, composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues."...

    Pres. George HW Bush at 1992 UN climate summit in Rio
     
    10/3/1988 "League Refuses to "Help Perpetrate a Fraud," League of Women Voters, News Release, lwv.org, For Immediate Release, Washington, DC
    ....... 
    "LEAGUE REFUSES TO "HELP PERPETRATE A FRAUD"

    WITHDRAWS SUPPORT FROM FINAL PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE"

    "The League of Women Voters is withdrawing its sponsorship of the presidential debate scheduled for mid-October because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter," League President Nancy M. Neuman said today.
    ..............  
    "It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and honest answers to tough questions," Neuman said. "The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."
    ................ 
    Neuman said that the campaigns presented the League with their debate agreement on September 28, two weeks before the scheduled debate. The campaigns' agreement was negotiated "behind closed doors" and was presented to the League as "a done deal," she said, its 16 pages of conditions not subject to negotiation.
    .............. 
    Most objectionable to the League, Neuman said, were conditions in the agreement that gave the campaigns unprecedented control over the proceedings. Neuman called "outrageous" the campaigns' demands that they control the selection of questioners, the composition of the audience, hall access for the press and other issues.
    ..............  
    "The campaigns' agreement is a closed-door masterpiece," Neuman said. "Never in the history of the League of Women Voters have two candidates' organizations come to us with such stringent, unyielding and self-serving demands."
    ......................  
    Neuman said she and the League regretted that the American people have had no real opportunities to judge the presidential nominees outside of campaign-controlled environments. "On the threshold of a new millenium, this country remains the brightest hope for all who cherish free speech and open debate," Neuman said. "Americans deserve to see and hear the men who would be president face each other in a debate on the hard and complex issues critical to our progress into the next century." 
    ..................... 
    Neuman issued a final challenge to both Vice President Bush and Governor Dukakis to "rise above your handlers and agree to join us in presenting the fair and full discussion the American public expects of a League of Women Voters debate."

    ...................

    Image caption: "Former US President George [HW] Bush addresses the 15th plenary session at the UN sponsored Earth Summit in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro,"...phys.org
    Former US president George Bush addresses the 15th plenary session of the UN-sponsored Earth Summit in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro. Twenty years ago, a burst of sunny optimism radiated from Rio de Janeiro as world leaders staged a meeting that would prove pivotal.

    Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-06-rio-summit-sick-planet.html#jCp
    ............
    ........................
    "Commission on Presidential Debates" 

    ....................
     Board of Directors includes hateful John Danforth and Olympia Snowe.

    ....................  
    John Danforth isn't quite finished destroying this country. 



    ...............................




     

    Tuesday, August 9, 2016

    At least 3 Board members of the Presidential TV Debate Commission are also members of the globalist Trilateral Commission: Mitch Daniels, Olympia Snowe, and Jane Harman

    At least 3 on the Presidential TV debate Board of Directors are also Trilateral Commission members as of Aug. 2016:

    Mitch Daniels
    Olympia Snowe
    Jane Harman


    "About the Trilateral Commission," trilateral.org  

    "The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into "globalization.""...The Trilateral Commission's founding in 1973 was based on "a sense that the United States was no longer in such a singular leadership position."...

    ..................................

    Board of Directors of TV Presidential Debate Commission who are also Trilateral Commission members (as above) are highlighted in red (added by me):

    "Commission on Presidential Debates"

    "Commission Leadership"

    Co-Chairmen

    Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr.
    Michael D. McCurry
    Honorary Co-Chairmen

    Gerald R. Ford*
    Jimmy Carter
    Ronald Reagan*
    Co-Chairman Emeritus

    Paul G. Kirk, Jr.
    Board of Directors

    Howard G. Buffett
    John C. Danforth
    Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr.
    Charles Gibson
    John Griffen
    Jane Harman
    Antonia Hernandez
    Reverend John I. Jenkins
    Jim Lehrer
    Newton N. Minow
    Richard D. Parsons
    Dorothy S. Ridings
    Olympia Snowe
    Shirley M. Tilghman

    Executive Director

    Janet H. Brown
    * Deceased
     
    ===========

    The Debate Commission picks the locations, sets the rules, selects the moderators, and determines the composition of the audience. As a non-profit corporation, it's not required to disclose its sponsors. 


    ==========



    ................ 

    Monday, September 26, 2016

    With literally trillions at stake, 3 Trilateral Commission members are installed on US TV Debate Commission. Global puppet Lester Holt is cheered on: "Lester Holt is carrying the weight of the nation," and Holt "has thought a lot about his responsibility to the viewing public," he's "not going to be a potted plant," Holt wants to avoid a repeat of so-called "widely criticized" Matt Lauer performance, what will Holt do "every time he hears a lie"-CNN

    Actual pathetic link in CNN article: "Related: Lester Holt is carrying the weight of the nation"

    At least 3 on the US Commission on Presidential Debates Board of Directors are also members of the globalist Trilateral Commission as of Aug. 2016:

    Mitch Daniels
    Olympia Snowe
    Jane Harman
     

    Monarchists are still calling the shots over the peasants in the colonies. The peasants think they're free, but they're not. 
    ........................ 

    9/25/16, "How Lester Holt is getting ready for Monday's debate," CNN, Brian Stelter

    "Lester Holt has called on several NBC News colleagues for advice as he prepares for the biggest night of his career.

    Holt's debate prep team has plotted possible questions for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and responses if the candidates stray from the truth. 

    But once the debate begins on Monday night, Holt will be on his own -- which is a big difference between primary debates and general election debates. 

    Holt has been mum about his debate prep, giving no interviews, even to NBC's own newscasts. 

    He has sought to tune out all of the chatter and speculation, according to people close to him. This includes Trump's false claim that Holt is a Democrat and the Clinton campaign's call for vigorous fact-checking during the debate. 

    But he has thought a lot about his responsibility to the viewing public. 

    With regards to fact-checking, "Lester is not going to be a potted plant," one NBC staffer close to Holt said. 

    Another staffer seconded that sentiment. 

    This doesn't mean Holt will interrupt every time he hears a lie. Officials at the Commission on Presidential Debates say the candidates should challenge each other. 

    But Holt will strive to avoid a repeat of NBC's "Commander in Chief Forum" earlier this month, when Trump falsely said he opposed the invasion of Iraq and interviewer Matt Lauer let it slide. 

    Lack of preparation was cited by observers as one possible reason for the widely-criticized performance. 

    The debate is different. Holt has had several weeks to prepare. And he has been in full-time study mode for several days. His last day on the "NBC Nightly News" was Tuesday; Savannah Guthrie has been filling in for him since. Guthrie will also anchor on Monday night. 

    According to the commission rules, Holt alone is responsible for the questions he asks. The commission gives no editorial direction.
     
    Related: Lester Holt is carrying the weight of the nation

    Holt is free to seek ideas and advice from anyone he wants. In recent days, his counselors have included NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; and the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez.

    Another key member of Holt's debate team is Sam Singal, the executive producer of Holt's "Nightly News." 

    "Meet the Press" moderator Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann have all helped as well. 

    But this is not an NBC debate -- it is all being organized by the commission. 

    When it comes time for the debate, only one NBC staffer will be with him. 

    During primary debates (including the Democratic debate Holt moderated in January) TV producers can speak with the moderator through earpieces, proposing followup questions and supporting the host. Some production teams are more hands-on than others. 

    But it works differently at general election debates organized by the commission. The only person in Holt's ear will be the commission's longtime executive producer, Marty Slutsky, who has produced all of the debates since 2000. 

    Slutsky keeps track of time and lets moderators know when they have to wrap up the debate. 

    Related: Ratings expectations for the debate are sky-high

    Holt has ample experience in high-pressure live TV situations, which is one of the reasons why the commission chose him to moderate the Clinton-Trump matchup. 

    "If there's anybody who can withstand the pressure and be down the middle and cool and calm and take this thing on, it is Lester Holt," his colleague Al Roker said on the "Today" show on Friday.

    "If all else fails, Lester could break out his bass," Tamron Hall joked. 

    Holt is a newsman by day, bandmate by night. Last Tuesday, he played his bass at a party for the 25th anniversary of NBC's 

    "Dateline" newsmagazine. It was a rare chance to unwind in between debate prep sessions. 

    When asked about Monday night, he demurred, signaling that he wants his moderating work to speak for itself."

    ---------------------------------

    Added: At least 3 on the Presidential TV debate Board of Directors are also Trilateral Commission members as of Aug. 2016:

    Mitch Daniels
    Olympia Snowe
    Jane Harman 


    "About the Trilateral Commission," trilateral.org

     "The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into "globalization.""...The Trilateral Commission's founding in 1973 was based on "a sense that the United States was no longer in such a singular leadership position."...

    ..................................
    .......
    Board of Directors of TV Presidential Debate Commission who are also Trilateral Commission members (as above) are highlighted in red (added by me):

    "Commission on Presidential Debates"

    "Commission Leadership"

    Co-Chairmen 

    • Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr. 
    • Michael D. McCurry
    Honorary Co-Chairmen

    Gerald R. Ford*
    Jimmy Carter
    Ronald Reagan*
    Co-Chairman Emeritus
     

    Paul G. Kirk, Jr.
     
    Board of Directors
    • Howard G. Buffett 
    • John C. Danforth 
    • Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 
    • Charles Gibson 
    • John Griffen 
    • Jane Harman 
    • Antonia Hernandez 
    • Reverend John I. Jenkins 
    • Jim Lehrer 
    • Newton N. Minow 
    • Richard D. Parsons 
    • Dorothy S. Ridings 
    • Olympia Snowe 
    • Shirley M. Tilghman 
    •  
    • Executive Director 
      • Janet H. Brown
    * Deceased
     
    ===========

    The Debate Commission picks the locations, sets the rules, selects the moderators, and determines the composition of the audience. As a non-profit corporation, it's not required to disclose its sponsors. 


    ==========




    .........................

    Followers

    Blog Archive

    About Me

    My photo
    I'm the daughter of an Eagle Scout and World War II Air Force pilot born in Brooklyn, finally settling in New Jersey.