End US War Machine: Who but the GOP would advance the trillion dollar, organized crime infested global warming scam by elevating Berkeley's Muller?

A longtime believer in man made global warming, that it has caused wars, will cause more, and needs one world government to save us (item at end), a UC Berkeley science guy named Richard Muller is now a global warming hero thanks in part to Republicans. In a worldwide media blitz, Muller, who just wants to help out and end alleged confusion, says we can all relax now, the 'earth' is warmer and therefore 'the debate' is officially over. Even though

that wasn't the question, since earth's temperatures have always fluctuated.

And even though he doesn't address the key fact that older data was discarded (item 6) and is therefore impossible to reproduce. And even though he made no conclusions about the

6 core issues on which the climate industry pivots:

that CO2 causes global warming,
that man's industries have created excess CO2,
that humanity's survival is threatened and islands are sinking as a result,
that the evil US middle class must pay billions in perpetuity to solve the problem they caused
that governments must regulate CO2 emissions
that the UN and others must administer the world's atmosphere and resources henceforth.

Recently he said global warming was a serious problem but people were turned off to it by inaccurate stories about polar bears and the like. Now it's all over though,

everyone can rest easy and believe the earth is warming just like the other studies said. And he's a good guy, he's on your side.

Word games about a deadly issue-- just what we need at this moment in time when it's open season on the American middle class, its own government leading the charge. Muller's good-guy deceptiveness is the kind that's been used to advance the multi-trillion dollar global warming industry since day 1. Politicians are happy to sell the country out to organized crime, climate profiteers, and parasitic UN/world government types. Muller's own passionate interest in world government has already been established.

From the article, 7/19/1996:

"He's (Muller) been serving on international disarmament panels

with US and Russian scientists."...(parag. 4)

The main thing he's concerned about is the key matter of understanding how the climate works. "What causes climate? What affects it? To what extent

do we affect climate?

To what extent are we disturbing it? These are important issues. I tend to be very passionate about this. When I think about it, I say: What is the effect if the temperature were to drop one or two degrees? The answer that I get is that areas which are good for agriculture will probably shift no more than three hundred miles.

But when that has happened

in the past, it has led to war.

"When people talk about global warming, we're talking about the great breadbasket

becoming a desert,

and perhaps the productive regions shifting north. So yes, it might be nicer if it were a little warmer in Berkeley during the summer,

but that's not what we're talking about.

And yes, if we had a global government and everybody loved everybody else and people were happy to migrate across national boundaries and could do so freely....

But I fear that
changes in climate have been a major-
if not the major-

cause of war in the past.

Climate change is potentially the biggest disaster that could occur. And

if humans have taken over and are now

the dominant driving force for climate-

which I think might be the case-

than we need to understand how it works." (item at end of piece)

-------------------------

comment which should replace all the headlines but won't:

bqrq permalink

May 25, 2011 12:37 pm

"“….Muller testified that his preliminary findings confirm what mainstream scientists have been saying all along: Earth is warming in line with the projections of climate models…”

Mr. Muller, myself and others concur on the following:

We may be able to agree that the Earth’s climate is experiencing a warming trend. There is no conclusive proof

that carbon dioxide is driving this trend,

nor is there proof that this warming trend is non-natural and unlike previous warm periods.

There is no conclusive proof that

government regulation of carbon dioxide emissions

would have any effect on this trend."

------------------------

11/29/09, "Climate change data dumped," TimesOnline UK, by Jonathan Leake (now subscription)

"Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years. The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was

forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation. The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape —

were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.

The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data. In a statement on its website, the CRU said:

“We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data.”...

Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled.That is now impossible. Roger Pielke, professor of environmental studies at Colorado University, discovered data had been lost when he asked for original records.

“The CRU is basically saying, ‘Trust us’.

So much for settling questions and resolving debates with science,” he said.

Jones was not in charge of the CRU when the data were thrown away in the 1980s, a time when climate change was seen as a less pressing issue.

The lost material was used to build the databases that have been his life’s work, showing how the world has warmed by 0.8C over the past 157 years. He and his colleagues say this temperature rise is “unequivocally” linked to greenhouse gas emissions generated by humans.

Their findings are one of the main pieces of evidence used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which says global warming is a threat to humanity."

-------------------

Der Spiegel, 11/19/09, "Stagnating Temperatures: Climatologists baffled by global warming time-out," by Gerald Traufetter

------------------