- "taqiyyah, in Islam, the practice of concealing one’s belief
Derived from the Arabic word waqa (“to shield oneself”), taqiyyah defies easy translation. English renderings such as “precautionary dissimulation” or “prudent fear” partly convey the term’s meaning of self-protection in the face of danger to oneself or, by extension and depending upon the circumstances, to one’s fellow Muslims.
Thus, taqiyyah may be used for either the protection of an individual or the protection of a community. Moreover, it is not used or even interpreted in the same way by every sect of Islam. Taqiyyah has been employed by the Shīʿites, the largest minority sect of Islam, because of their historical persecution and political defeats not only by non-Muslims but also at the hands of the majority Sunni sect. Scriptural authority for taqiyyah is derived from two statements in the Qurʾān, the holy book of Islam.
The 28th verse of the third sura (chapter) says that, out of fear of Allāh (God),
- believers should not show preference in friendship to unbelievers “unless to safeguard yourselves against them.”
- Thus, even among Islamic scholars who agree that the verses provide Qurʾānic sanction for taqiyyah, there is considerable disagreement about how the verses do this and about what taqiyyah permits in practice.
One hadith in particular mentions that Muhammad waited 13 years, until he could “gain a sufficient number of loyal supporters,”
- before combatting his powerful polytheistic enemies in Mecca.
refrain from fighting until he had “the support of forty men.”
Some scholars interpret these legends as examples of taqiyyah. By avoiding combat against enemies of Islam until they could muster sufficient military force and moral support,
- ʿAlī and Muhammad preserved not only their own lives but their
Neither the Qurʾān nor the Hadith decrees points of doctrine or prescribes guidelines for behaviour when using taqiyyah. The circumstances in which it may be used and the extent to which it is obligatory have been widely disputed by Islamic scholars. According to scholarly and judicial consensus, it is not justified by the threat of flogging, temporary imprisonment, or other relatively tolerable punishments.
- The danger to the believer must be unavoidable. Also, while
it is not a license for a shallow profession of faith. Oaths taken with mental reservation, for example, are justified on the basis that God accepts what one believes inwardly. Consideration of community rather than private welfare is stressed in most cases."
Encyclopedia Britannica
.
No comments:
Post a Comment