US 'Media' provides killing fields where thugs use words as weapons to silence dissent and win elections. eg Biden and Jake Tapper.

• "Call them racist," saliva drenched Journolist theme continues to play out in media. Right of center people should 'drop the rope'- stop going on the shows. The entire issue is fake and
  
• wastes an enormous amount of precious time and energy. That's the special twist of this gimmick, that it's baseless and meant to exhaust opponents
  
• getting them to chase their tails.
  

Where Biden says on ABC television that "you saw Tea Party racism on television". And the television host "journalist" Jake Tapper introduced the hate speech question to get the exact response it got. Where was it on tv, Jake or Biden? Where exactly was it on television? Where are the lawsuits for this claim? Why is Tapper not fired or at least outed for being a PR flak?

• 7/25/10, "Political Relativism: Realistic radicals vs Rhetorical radicals and the art of miscommunication," by Adam Baldwin, Big Journalism

"Last Sunday, President Obama deployed Vice President Biden to lie and poison the well on Jake Tapper’s show: “The NAACP had a convention in the last week, and they passed a resolution saying that elements of the Tea Party are racist. Do you think elements of the Tea Party are racist?”:

Well, the truth is that at least elements that were involved in some of the Tea Party folks expressed racist views, you saw that on television. But, I don’t think — I don’t — I wouldn’t characterize the Tea Party as racist.

There are individuals who are either members of or on the periphery of some of their things, their — their protests — that have expressed really unfortunate comments. And, again, it was all over TV, all over your network, you know? A black Congressman walking up the stairs of the Capitol."

• FINE. WE'RE ON TV RIGHT NOW. LET'S SEE THE TAPE, JAKE.
  

(Television MADE UP THE DESCRIPTION. There is no video or audio evidence of these charges despite the area being awash in audio and video devices. ed).

(continuing): "But, I don’t believe, the president doesn’t believe that the Tea Party is, uh, is a racist organization. I don’t believe that. Very conservative. Very different views on government and a whole lot of things. But it is not a racist organization.

Coincidentally, the day before on Geraldo at Large, New Black Panther leader Malik Zulu Shabazz stated:

A black man, really, or a black leader cannot be a racist… I have the right to use different language… We endorse fully the NAACP resolution.

Saul Alinsky disciple Obama is what his spiritual mentor described as a “realistic radical,” while Mr. Shabazz is what Alinsky would scorn as a “rhetorical radical.” The difference is not found in the substance of their mutually desired ends, but rather in the stylistic means towards achieving their utopian ends, i.e., social justice’s heaven on earth.

The attempt by the modern radicals to demonize the Tea Party recalls a 1972 incident at Tulane University in which Saul Alinsky instructed students how to disrupt a Vietnam speech by then UN representative, George H.W. Bush. AlinskyKu Klux Klan, cheer and wave ‘The K.K.K. supports Bush’ signs. told them to dress as

Lenin once said that the

• purpose of a political argument is not to refute your opponent
  

“but to wipe him from the face of the earth.” Therefore seize on any weapon, in this case a symbol of one of the greatest evil that any Americans were ever associated with, and use it to obliterate everything good America ever did. If America’s cause in Vietnam is the Ku Klux Klan, then its cause is evil and America is evil.

As with contemporary Soros-paid stooges, it matters not to Obama, NAACP, NBP that the Tea Party movement is not a race war. If the Tea Party can be smeared as “racist,” then its non-persons can all be wiped from the face of the earth.

While Mr. Obama’s de facto by proxy endorsement of the infamous NAACP resolution is practiced in the art of deception-by-equivocation, Mr. Shabazz’s inartful declaration is intentional shock-and-awe rhetoric.

Both aim for the same result – to endorse the NAACP’s race arson — but the former seems granted the benefit of the doubt by media gatekeepers because it pretends denial of the accusation. The latter, stripped of euphemistic veil, is simply too stark an admission for media dissembling, and therefore ignored.

Leftists and their demagogic shibboleths have crumbled in retreat from Andrew Breitbart’s $100,000 Unted Negro College Fund reward for proof of the — now presidential — claim of seeing (planted) “elements that were involved in some of the Tea Party folks expressed racist views… all over TV.”

Alinsky tactics are now boomeranging on radicals more often than not – Rule#4:

Make opponents live up to their own book of rules.

With the attempted “racist” smear against the diversity that is the Tea Party, Rule #11 has been an utterly clumsy failure:

Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

on the same program as Shabazz, produced a letter sent by a coalition of Tea Party leaders denouncing racism and asking to work with the Congressional Black Caucus to identify the people purported to have made racial remarks. The CBC has yet to respond.

What did the president know about this letter, and when did he know it?

Or, in a political relativist’s terms: What might he mean, and/or when might he mean it?

David Horowitz:

The radical organizer, Alinsky explains, “does not have a fixed truth – truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing. He is a political relativist.” And that will do it. Being a radical in the service of the higher good is a license to do anything that is required to achieve that good.

Ironically, the radicals have been self-victimized by Alinsky’s own Rule #7:

A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

“You say you want a revolution… You say you’ve got a real solution, well, you know, we’d all love to see the plan.” – John Lennon"

***