6/23/11, "Lawrence Solomon: Supreme skeptics," Financial Post, Lawrence Solomon
"The justices of the United States Supreme Court this week became the world’s most august global warming sceptics. Not by virtue of their legal reasoning – the global warming case they decided turned on a technical legal issue — but in their surprising commentary. Global warming is by no means a settled issue, they made clear, suggesting it would be
- foolhardy to assume it was.
“The court, we caution, endorses no particular view of the complicated issues related to carbon-dioxide emissions and climate change,” reads the 8-0 decision,
- delivered by the court’s acclaimed liberal,
- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Justice Ginsburg notes carbon dioxide is necessary and ubiquitous, and thus shouldn’t be the target of indiscriminate attacks. “After all, we each emit carbon dioxide merely by breathing,” she notes, repeating a point that Dyson couldn’t have said better himself.
To see exactly what the Supreme Court said in its remarkable American Electric Power v. Connecticut decision, click here."
=========================
While CO2 has increased, temperatures have decreased, per UAH and HADCRUT for the US and globally (bright green and bright blue lines). CO2 does not cause global warming. The UN's computerized predictions were quite wrong Unfortunately, trillions of dollars have been stolen from people and lives lost based on a falsehood. ed.
=========================
- Entergy was one of the plaintiffs in the 2007 Supreme Court case which it won. Entergy stock rose to an all time high:
- "Wall St. understood this. On Monday, when the EPA decision came down, Entergy stock
- jumped to an all time high of $107.52 per share."...
- The ruling made big money for Entergy Corp.
- extinction of humanity without urgent action on global warming and
- giant corporation as a humanitarian against evil Wall Street interests.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment