June 26 court ruling on EPA regulations explicitly states it did not examine 'the science,' said 'is not our role'

6/27/12, "US appeals court upholds rules curbing greenhouse gases," Nature.com, Helen Thompson

"“In the end, petitioners are asking us to re-weigh the scientific evidence before EPA and reach our own conclusion. This is not our role,” said the panel of three judges in a sharply worded 82-page brief."

===============================

Chris Mooney in apparent denial:

6/27/12, "Puzzler: After the D.C. Circuit court explicitly said that they didn't "re-weigh the scientific evidence before EPA and reach our own conclusion", English major Chris Mooney suggests that they subjected "denier" claims

• to "serious and careful intellectual scrutiny"." Tom Nelson

via Tom Nelson