End US War Machine: A trillion dollar industry and the future of the UK Monarchy rest on the UK Met Office coming up with 'corrected' temperatures when needed

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

A trillion dollar industry and the future of the UK Monarchy rest on the UK Met Office coming up with 'corrected' temperatures when needed

In 2007 UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the carbon market was key "to the economic fortunes of the City of London.""...Obviously the UK Met Office will come up with whatever temperatures are necessary.

3/20/12, Piers Corbyn responds to latest UK Met Office temperature "corrections," Climate Realists

"EVER BEEN HAD?!

The Met Office and BBC have just their revised HADCRUT (Hadley Centre - Climate Research Unit of the University of Fraud in East Anglia) data set which of course

like ALL previous revisions

adjusts the facts in order to bolster the crumbling lie

of man-made climate change. I posted a comment on the matter on WUWT:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/19/crus-new-hadcrut4-hiding-the-decline-yet-again-2/#comment-928992

Maurizio – Omnologos asks why cannot the Russians cool the past too? My understanding is that it has already been substantially cooled in Stalin's time especially in winters because the state handouts to the towns depended on how cold it was, and no meteorologist worth his life

would report temperatures

less cold than required to get enough to eat.

What we should ask (if I am not mistaken) is what efforts have there been or can there be to put these Stalinised temperatures right? - making the past warmer! (oh-oh forbidden zone)

Today we have a similar problem. None of the GW fraudsters will do anything to negate the message of their gravy train.

I think we can safely conclude without fear of contradiction by any rational objective sentient being:-

1. The 'corrected' figures are fraud.
2. The temperature variations real or fraudulent are of no consequence to man, plant or beast, the temperature changes themselves, if real, about 0.5C in a century are not something that humans can even feel in a day.

The obsession with temperatures by all sides in this non-debate is insane, what changes weather and climate

is jet stream shifts and other circulation pattern changes,

and these control temperature rather than the other way around.

Of course - wait for it - solar activity (magnetic and particle) and lunar modulation thereof is the main controller of weather and climate change. This approach is now able to reliably forecast certain key major changes on the sun - eg Earth-facing coronal holes, and key extreme features of USA weather weeks and months ahead. For example see our WeatherAction USA,

confirmed predictions of the present very warm center

and E/SE USA alongside cold West and the preceding severe thunder, tornadoes and giant hail in lower mid-west around mid month - from (in this case) 3 weeks ahead to timing of a day or so:

http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews12No17.pdf

Anybody or organisation which is serious about the weather needs these forecasts. However I am finding that those in authority forego what they need

to fulfill their supposed 'duties' to protect the public and save lives,

in order to preserve the fraudulent ideology of man-made climate change.

Thanks,
Piers Corbyn"
==================

The future financial survival of the UK Monarchy is dependent on the world continuing to believe in catastrophic man made global warming. It will be making much of its money on lease payments for offshore wind turbines. Obviously, the UK Met Office will come up with whatever temperatures are necessary:

10/24/10, "Queen's £38m a year windfarm windfall," This is money, by Martin Delgado and Christopher Leake

12/31/10, "One's in the money! Why Prince Charles's secret 20-year campaign could make him the richest king in history," UK Daily Mail, G. Levy

2/9/11, "UK's Prince Charles blasts climate-change skeptics," AP

10/24/10, "'It is wholly inappropriate that the Palace should have such a direct interest in a subject like windfarms, given Prince Charles's obsession with renewable energy. It raises the question as to whether he is seeking to increase his own