"The report also projected that out-of-pocket cost paid directly by
consumers will continue to increase as the number of people covered by
high-deductible plans keeps growing."...
7/13/16, "New peak for US health care spending: $10,345 per person," AP, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar
"The nation's health care tab this year is expected to surpass $10,000
per person for the first time, the government said Wednesday. The new
peak means the Obama administration will pass the problem of high health
care costs on to its successor.
The report from number crunchers at the Department of Health and
Human Services projects that health care spending will grow at a faster
rate than the national economy over the coming decade.
That squeezes the
ability of federal and state governments, not to mention employers and
average citizens, to pay.
Growth is projected to average 5.8 percent from 2015 to 2025, below
the pace before the 2007-2009 economic recession but faster than in
recent years that saw health care spending moving in step with modest
economic growth.
National health expenditures will hit $3.35 trillion this year, which
works out to $10,345 for every man, woman and child. The annual
increase of 4.8 percent for 2016 is lower than the forecast for the rest
of the decade.
A stronger economy, faster growth in medical prices and an aging
population are driving the trend. Medicare and Medicaid are expected to
grow more rapidly than private insurance as the baby-boom generation
ages. By 2025, government at all levels will account for nearly half of
health care spending, 47 percent. The report also projects that the share of Americans with health
insurance will remain above 90 percent, assuming that President Barack
Obama's law survives continued Republican attacks."...
[Ed. note: Please. So-called "Republican attacks" are fake (so the rubes will think the GOP is "fighting" for them). The GOP E has made clear over many years it has loved ObamaCare since day 1. It loves the same big government scams AP does.]
(continuing): "The analysis serves as a reality check for the major political parties as they prepare for their presidential conventions.
Usually in a national election there are sweeping differences between
Democrats and Republicans on health care, one of the chief contributors
to the government's budget problems. But this time the discussion has
been narrowly focused on the fate of Obama's law and little else."...
[Ed. note : Focused on "Obama's law and little else?" Sir, where have you been? Have you ever heard of TPP? First of all, it's not "Obama's law." It's the GOP E's law. In Nov. 2010 we gave the GOP House a landslide victory for one reason, to make it easy for them to defund ObamaCare. The House can act unilaterally on financial matters, doesn't need Senate or White House approval. To this day, the GOP House has never allowed a standalone, up or down vote to defund ObamaCare to come to the floor. If you mention today to any GOP E that the House has "Power of the Purse," they'll lie and say, well, not really, not the way people think, people are confused about that. They've had "repeal" votes, or funding votes combined with other issues, but none about defunding alone in which the House could act unilaterally.]
(continuing): "Republican Donald Trump vows to repeal "Obamacare," while saying he
won't cut Medicare or have people "dying in the street." Democrat
Hillary Clinton has promised to expand government health care benefits.
Both candidates would authorize Medicare to negotiate prescription
drug prices, which the report says will grow somewhat more slowly after
recent sharp increases.
Obama's health care law attempted to control costs by reducing
Medicare payments to hospitals and insurers, as well as encouraging
doctors to use teamwork to keep patients healthier. But it also
increased costs by expanding coverage to millions who previously lacked
it. People with health insurance use more medical care than the
uninsured."...
[Ed. note: Is this substantiated in the HHS study AP is discussing? If so, what section or page number?]
(continuing): "Despite much effort and some progress reining in costs, health care
spending is still growing faster than the economy and squeezing out
other priorities, said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a
Responsible Federal Budget, a bipartisan group that advocates for
reducing government red ink.
"No serious candidate for president can demonstrate fiscal leadership
without having a plan to help address these costs," she said. "No
matter whether a candidate has an agenda that focuses on tax cuts or
spending increases, there will be little room for either.""...
[Ed. note: One "serious candidate" has addressed in detail substantial ways in which the US is currently wasting or cheating itself out of money that can be reversed so funds will be available for America's needs.]
(continuing): "The $10,345-per-person spending figure is an average; it doesn't mean
that every individual spends that much in the health care system. In
fact, U.S. health care spending is wildly uneven.
About 5 percent of the population — those most frail or ill —
accounts for nearly half the spending in a given year, according to a
separate government study."...
[Ed. note: Which "separate government study" would that be? Readers need the study's name or a link.]
(continuing): "Meanwhile, half the population has little or
no health care costs, accounting for 3 percent of spending.
Of the total $3.35 trillion spending projected this year, hospital
care accounts for the largest share, about 32 percent. Doctors and other
clinicians account for nearly 20 percent. Prescription drugs bought
through pharmacies account for about 10 percent.
The report also projected that out-of-pocket cost paid directly by
consumers will continue to increase as the number of people covered by
high-deductible plans keeps growing."...
[Ed. note: Let's see, that would be "Obama's law," as AP puts it. The AP usually saves their most meaningful point until the last or next to last sentence of their articles.]
(continuing): "Wednesday's report was published online by the journal Health Affairs."
___
Online:
National Health Spending Projections: http://tinyurl.com/h787l4j
..............
No comments:
Post a Comment