State of Idaho bill doesn't specifically mention Sharia, but says rulings can't be based on: "any foreign law or legal system that
would not grant the parties the same rights guaranteed by state and U.S.
constitutions."
3/2/16, "Republican leaders introduce anti-Shariah law bill," AP via ksl.com , Boise, Idaho
"Republican leaders agreed Wednesday to introduce legislation designed
to keep Shariah law and other foreign codes out of Idaho courts or
government agencies.
The proposal doesn't specifically mention Shariah
law_derived of the Quran and rulings and sayings by the Prophet
Muhammad. But it does say courts, administrative agencies or state
tribunals can't base rulings on any foreign law or legal system that
would not grant the parties the same rights guaranteed by state and U.S.
constitutions.
To date, there are no known cases in which an Idaho judge has based a ruling on Islamic law.
Bill sponsor Rep. Eric Redman, a Republican from Athol
who is up for re-election in May, says the bill is needed to protect
American values.
"This bill isn't just about Shariah law, but Shariah law is a major concern," he said.
Pictures of a severed hand and a man about to be
beheaded were included in the information packet Redman distributed to
legislative leaders considering the proposal. The pictures were pasted
in between definitions of Shariah law and accusing the Prophet Muhammad
of being a pedophile.
Fears over Sharia law and Muslim culture have been a
growing theme in Idaho, starting with a former Muslim turned Christian
pastor who met with a dozen lawmakers in the Idaho Capitol last year to
call for limiting Islamic immigration and blocking refugees from
settling in the state. A few months later, lawmakers were forced to
gather for a special legislative session to pass state laws to comply
with federal regulations after a handful of legislators warned child
support laws were connected to Shariah law.
Meanwhile, a Twin Falls refugee resettlement center has
come under fire from critics arguing that it should be shut down
because of fears the refugees would be radicalized Muslims, terrorists
in disguise.
Majority Leader Mike Moyle, Assistant Majority Leader
Brent Crane, Majority Caucus Chair John Vander Woude and Chairwoman
Christy Perry, who all sit on the House Ways and Means Committee, all
voted in favor of the bill with no discussion.
The panel's three
Democratic members opposed the measure.
The bill's introduction doesn't automatically imply the
proposal will pass in the Republican-dominated Statehouse. It still
must be directed to a legislative panel for a hearing. If it gets that
far — barring any intervention from a chairman or leadership — the
legislation will likely pass.
House Minority Leader John Rusche particularly objected
to giving the bill a hearing even if it ends up going nowhere in the
Statehouse. He argued that several members inside his minority caucus
have been denied being considered even though they are not as extreme.
The Idaho Attorney General's office did not find any
obvious federal or state constitutional violations, but their legal
review did caution against keeping the bill so broadly written.
"We strongly recommend that you give careful
consideration to the draft legislation's potential effect given the
breadth of its 'right guaranteed' language and the variety of legal
systems and substantive law in other nations," wrote Brian Kane,
assistant chief deputy with the attorney general's office."
...............
No comments:
Post a Comment