2/27/16, "Marco Rubio Pushed for Immigration Reform With Conservative Media," NY Times, Jason Horowitz. "A version of this article appears
in print on February 28, 2016, on page A22 of the New York edition with the headline: Rubio Pushed for an Overhaul of Immigration Policy With Conservative Media."
"A few weeks after Senator Marco Rubio joined a bipartisan push for an immigration overhaul in 2013, he
arrived alongside Senator Chuck Schumer at the executive dining room of
News Corporation’s Manhattan headquarters for dinner.
Their mission was to persuade Rupert Murdoch, the owner of the media empire, and Roger Ailes,
the chairman and chief executive of its Fox News division, to keep the
network’s on-air personalities from savaging the legislation and give it
a fighting chance at survival.
Mr.
Murdoch, an advocate of immigration reform, and Mr. Ailes, his top
lieutenant and the most powerful man in conservative television, agreed
at the Jan. 17, 2013, meeting to give the senators some breathing room.
The
dinner at News Corporation headquarters — which has not been previously
reported — and the subsequent outreach to Mr. Limbaugh illustrate the
degree to which Mr. Rubio served as the chief envoy to the conservative
media for the group supporting the legislation. The bill would have
provided a pathway to American citizenship for 11 million illegal
immigrants along with measures to secure the borders and ensure that
foreigners left the United States upon the expiration of their visas.
Those discussions of just a few years ago now seem of a distant era, when, after the re-election of President Obama, momentum was building to overhaul the nation’s immigration system.
The
senators embarked on a tour of editorial boards and newsrooms, and Mr.
Rubio was even featured as the “Republican savior” on the cover of Time
magazine for his efforts to change immigration laws. He already was
being mentioned as a 2016 presidential contender.
 |
| 2/18/2013 Time cover |
Now
Mr. Trump has become the Republican leader in national polls by picking
fights with Mr. Ailes and offending the Latino voters whom Mr. Rubio
had hoped to bring into the Republican fold."...
[Ed. note: No link provided to substantiate this claim.]
(continuing): "And while Mr. Rubio
ultimately abandoned the bipartisan legislation in the face of growing
grass-roots backlash and the collapse of the conservative media truce,
he, and to a certain degree Fox News, are still paying for that dinner.
Fox’s
ratings remain strong, but its standing among Republican viewers,
influenced by Mr. Trump’s offensive, has dropped to a three-year low, according to YouGov BrandIndex. And Mr. Rubio’s opponents, for whom Mr. Schumer, a Democrat from New York, has become the ultimate villain, continue to depict the Florida Republican as a duplicitous establishment insider.
“If
you look at the ‘Gang of Eight,’ one individual on this stage broke his
promise to the men and women who elected him and wrote the amnesty
bill,” Senator Ted Cruz said of Mr. Rubio during Thursday’s Republican
debate. And as Mr. Rubio defended himself, Mr. Trump’s campaign manager,
Corey Lewandowski, posted “MARCO ‘AMNESTY’ RUBIO” on Twitter.
The
so-called Gang of Eight was four Democrats and four Republicans,
including Mr. Rubio, who drafted an immigration bill in 2013. It passed
the Senate but was stymied by conservative opposition in the House.
Details
of the dinner, and a previous one in 2011, were provided to The New
York Times by an attendee of one of the meetings and two people with
knowledge of what was discussed at both get-togethers.
None of the attendees agreed to be identified for this article because the conversations were supposed to be confidential.
But
on Monday, Mr. Limbaugh shed light on his interactions with the
senators when he told a caller frustrated with his criticism of Mr.
Rubio that the immigration position the senator had advocated “comes
right out of the Gang of Eight bill.”
Mr. Limbaugh added, “I’ve had it explained to me by no less than Senator Schumer.”
Mr. Schumer declined to comment for this article. But before Mr. Obama’s re-election and soon afterward, he could hardly stop talking with conservative senators and media power brokers about the chance to pass comprehensive immigration legislation.
As
early as March 9, 2011, Mr. Schumer joined Senator Lindsey Graham,
Republican of South Carolina and another eventual member of the Gang of
Eight, at the Palm restaurant in Manhattan, where they made their case
to Mr. Murdoch, Mr. Ailes and Mr. Limbaugh in a private room. The
senators argued how damaging the word “amnesty” was to their efforts,
and walked Mr. Limbaugh through their vision for an immigration
overhaul.
The
senators were especially eager to try to neutralize conservative media,
which proved lethal to a big push for immigration changes in 2007. A
study by the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism
showed that conservative news shows had devoted about a quarter of their
time to immigration.
In
late 2012, after Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee, lost the
presidential election in part because of his dismal performance with
Latino voters, Mr. Rubio joined the fight. On one Sunday alone in April
2013, he made an appearance on seven talk shows to advocate the
immigration overhaul, including on “Fox News Sunday.”
Mr.
Rubio also reached out to other conservative power brokers, including
the radio hosts Mark Levin and Laura Ingraham, telling them that the
legislation did not amount to amnesty. The Fox anchors Sean Hannity and
Bill O’Reilly became more supportive.
At the time, The Washington Post reported
that Mr. Rubio’s advisers were monitoring to the minute how much time
the hosts devoted to immigration, and that “they are heartened that the
volume is much diminished.”
Mr.
Rubio publicly and privately worked to assuage the fears of Mr.
Limbaugh, who on air called him a “thoroughbred conservative” and
assured one wary listener that “Marco Rubio is not out to hurt this country or change it the way the liberals are.”
On
Jan. 29, 2013, the same day Mr. Obama highlighted immigration in Las
Vegas, Mr. Limbaugh had Mr. Rubio on as a guest to talk about
immigration and called him “admirable and noteworthy” during a warm
conversation about the bipartisan immigration plan.
“Well, not just that,” swung Mr. Rubio. “That alone is not enough.”
The conversation concluded with Mr. Rubio saying: “Thank you for the opportunity, Rush. I appreciate it.”
“You bet,” Mr. Limbaugh said."
.............................
"Hanging around and chattering for
decades," "the Conservative Entertainment
Complex" derives "their income by pandering to conservative anger while
offering no real solutions."
1/22/16, "National Review just handed Donald Trump the Election," Republican Newswatch, by Doug Ibendahl "Doug Ibendahl is a Chicago Attorney and a former General Counsel of the Illinois Republican Party."
 |
| 11/9/2015, Trump in Springfield, Illinois |
"National Review’s publication
of the collective anti-Donald Trump missives from 22 self-appointed
conservative potentates has caused quite a stir in Republican circles.
The nationwide responses range from, “Wait, I thought National Review went out of business years ago,” to “Ed Meese? Seriously?”
The Gang of 22 have officially become parodies of themselves. One
would have to reach back to the days of Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew to
lift an adequate quote to describe them.
“Nattering nabobs of negativism,” “vicars of vacillation,”
“pusillanimous pussyfooters,” “the decadent few,” “ideological eunuchs,”
“the effete corps of impudent snobs,” or “the hopeless, hysterical
hypochondriacs of history” – take your pick, because they all apply
about equally well to each and every one of them.
............
So clueless is the Gang of 22 they can’t even see how they’ve
stumbled right into the narrative Trump’s been communicating so
successfully for months. Just like the elected officials from both
parties, the Gang of 22 has been GREAT at complaining about stuff, year,
after year, after year.
But getting anything accomplished? Not so much.
..........
Many of the Gang of 22 have been hanging around and chattering for
decades, and some are active cogs in the Conservative Entertainment
Complex, deriving their income by pandering to conservative anger while
offering no real solutions.
Donald Trump represents a threat to these ineffectual poohbahs in the
same way he represents a threat to do-nothing public officials.
.........
Jealousy is also seriously at work here. Trump is inspiring and
exciting a broad spectrum of the country like no member of the Gang of
22 ever has, or ever will.
In just seven months of campaigning, Trump already has more Americans
listening to a Republican message than the entire Gang of 22 could
muster over decades. Trump understands that before you can advance the
ball, you have to convince people to take time from their busy lives to
listen. No one on the GOP side since Ronald Reagan has accomplished that
like Trump.
No one else has come close, and certainly no one from that “effete corps of impudent snobs” to which the National Review thinks we should defer.
But Americans care about results. They can plainly see that all of
the empty talk from the Gang of 22 got us eight years of Barack Obama,
and a loss in pretty much every conservative battle there was to lose.
.........
At the same time when Americans look at Donald Trump’s life they get a
lot of assurance that here is finally a man who shares their focus on
actually getting results. And Trump returns the respect by recognizing
regular hard-working Americans are a lot smarter than any of the
“ideological eunuchs” in all of their pontificating glory.
The “pusillanimous pussyfooters” love to nitpick Trump’s words, but
what voters are looking for this year is competence and accomplishment.
Donald Trump has an actual record of delivering both in spades.
...........
The Gang of 22 is right to be terrified. A President who could get
things done would expose them as the irrelevant creatures they truly
are.
It can’t happen fast enough."
...........
Doug Ibendahl is a Chicago Attorney and a former General Counsel of the Illinois Republican Party." image via Republican Newswatch"
=============
==================
Added: "He is likable as hell, isn’t he, Mr. Producer!?"
===============
=============
Comment: Most of us have known for years that Rush Limbaugh was Establishment. Meaning donor class, government class, America last, Americans last. He's been especially unhelpful to this country during Republican primary seasons including the one we're having now. At other times, he provides useful information. For those interested, his website (RushLimbaugh.com) contains transcripts of his daily shows and links to news articles he uses. I don't know of any other radio talk show hosts who do this. A transcript provides information in seconds. A podcast or video, for example, isn't useful, except to authenticate. I need information quickly that can be shared quickly. Most people don't have extra hours daily to transcribe radio talk shows.
..............
